CPR for LLMs: Critical-Point Routing against Catastrophic Forgetting in Domain Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is the de facto standard for adapting large language models (LLMs) to target domains, but it often degrades the model's general capabilities, a phenomenon known as catastrophic forgetting. Existing approaches typically modify the SFT loss to mitigate forgetting, but they inevitably operate along a domain-generality trade-off. In this work, we step outside this trade-off by decoupling the two capabilities at the model level: we keep the original base model for general capability, and selectively invoke the SFT expert only when domain-specific knowledge is required. Specifically, we propose CPR (Critical-Point Routing), a token-level routing framework between a base model and its expert derivative, based on critical tokens where the base model fails but the expert succeeds. We train a lightweight hierarchical router that estimates the expert-call probability per token, and pair it with a tailored inference procedure that combines momentum smoothing and threshold gating. Across diverse model-domain configurations, CPR achieves state-of-the-art across all settings, surpassing SFT expert by 1.4-5.5% in domain performance while recovering its general-capability drop from 3.4-14.5% to at most 0.5%, with minimal overhead from invoking the expert on only one-third of tokens.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.
Builds on
26 of 33 references.
References · 26
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,356
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
- 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 853
- 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 682
- 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 639
14 more
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 609
- 2021FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Datacited by 562
- 2024Hybrid LLM: Cost-Efficient and Quality-Aware Query Routingcited by 372
- 2021A Diverse Corpus for Evaluating and Developing English Math Word Problem Solverscited by 318
- 2024OpenMathInstruct-2: Accelerating AI for Math with Massive Open-Source Instruction Datacited by 200
- 2023Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Language Models via Implicit Inferencecited by 144
- 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 127
- 2025SFT Doesn't Always Hurt General Capabilities: Revisiting Domain-Specific Fine-Tuning in LLMscited by 24
- 2024More Than Catastrophic Forgetting: Integrating General Capabilities For Domain-Specific LLMscited by 21
- 2025Automatic Evaluation of Healthcare LLMs Beyond Question-Answeringcited by 20
- 2026Entropy-Adaptive Fine-Tuning: Resolving Confident Conflicts to Mitigate Forgettingcited by 16
- 2025Don't Throw Away Your Pretrained Modelcited by 10
- 2026Token-Level LLM Collaboration via FusionRoutecited by 9
- 2025Learning from the Undesirable: Robust Adaptation of Language Models without Forgettingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.