mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Diagnosing Diversity Collapse and Validating Mask-Conditioned Diffusion for Labeled Microtubule Microscopy

arXiv 2610.09957 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2026eess.IVcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Medical imaging and segmentation

Abstract (arXiv)

Mask-conditioned diffusion models have become standard for generating labeled training data in biomedical imaging. But the tools used to evaluate them were built for a different problem. Standard metrics like FID and KID score images through ImageNet-trained features. Those features do not transfer to microscopy, leaving the metrics poorly calibrated for specialized domains. Even with a domain-appropriate feature space, a single blended number can still hide a real failure: a model can produce visually plausible images that still transfer poorly to downstream tasks. We identify a specific failure mode: Late in training, realism keeps improving while texture diversity collapses. The model settles onto a fixed color palette, converging to a high-similarity, low-diversity state that standard metrics do not penalize. Therefore, we propose a diversity-aware diagnostic in a domain-validated feature space. It combines a realism axis based on inter-similarity to real images with a diversity axis based on intra-similarity among generated samples. This diagnostic selects a checkpoint that domain experts cannot reliably distinguish from real recordings in a forced-choice study. It also yields useful downstream segmentation: a segmenter trained only on synthetically labeled data reaches a median skeletonised IoU comparable to one trained on real data, at lower cross-fold variance, and clearly ahead of the best available public alternative in this domain, a parametric renderer. We also reproduce a data-efficient hyperparameter-transfer experiment from prior work, tuning several foundation segmenters on a small labeled subset and evaluating on real images: transfer is stronger with our data. We release DiffuMT on HuggingFace, including the triplet dataset, code to reproduce the downstream-utility validation, and a standalone diagnostic tool for evaluating mask-conditioned diffusion models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical imaging and segmentation, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MTFlow: Time-Conditioned Flow Matching for Microtubule Segmentation in Noisy Microscopy Images
  2. 2025Adapting Video Diffusion Models for Time-Lapse Microscopy
  3. 2025Diffusion-Based Synthetic Brightfield Microscopy Images for Enhanced Single Cell Detection
  4. 2025Revealing Subtle Phenotypes in Small Microscopy Datasets Using Latent Diffusion Models
  5. 2024Cascaded Diffusion Models for 2D and 3D Microscopy Image Synthesis to Enhance Cell Segmentation
  6. 2025Compressing Biology: Evaluating the Stable Diffusion VAE for Phenotypic Drug Discovery
  7. 2025MSDM: Generating Task-Specific Pathology Images with a Multimodal Conditioned Diffusion Model for Cell and Nuclei Segmentation
  8. 2023Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models for Generation of Realistic Fully-Annotated Microscopy Image Data Sets