mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What Makes Synthetic Hard Negatives Work in Vision-Language Pretraining?

arXiv 2610.09700 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Synthetic hard negatives generated in the representation space have proven effective for unimodal self-supervised learning, but transferring this idea to vision-language pretraining is not straightforward. We analyze six representation-space synthesis strategies and identify two failure modes in their transfer to vision-language pretraining: cross-modal constructions that produce overly easy negatives or pull them toward the query, and intra-modal constructions that incorporate the matched positive. We also observe logit-scale saturation when training with synthetic hard negatives and a learnable temperature, and find that fixing the temperature improves downstream performance. Using this geometric analysis we propose SNAP, which generates intra-modal hard negatives that never involve the positive from either modality, avoiding both failure modes entirely. SNAP is model-agnostic, requires no external generative models, and adds less than 10% training time overhead. Evaluated on top of CLIP and FLIP across multiple architectures and datasets, SNAP delivers consistent improvements on zero-shot retrieval, zero-shot classification, and linear probe evaluation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 28 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

Builds on

28 of 81 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024CLIPS: An Enhanced CLIP Framework for Learning with Synthetic Captions25 Nov
  2. 2023SILC: Improving Vision Language Pretraining with Self-Distillation20 Oct
  3. 2023Contrasting Intra-Modal and Ranking Cross-Modal Hard Negatives to Enhance Visio-Linguistic Compositional Understanding15 Jun

Other references · 25

  1. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
  4. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  5. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  6. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  7. 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,127
  8. 2021Florence: A New Foundation Model for Computer Visioncited by 802
  9. 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 786
  10. 2021FILIP: Fine-grained Interactive Language-Image Pre-Trainingcited by 626
  11. 2020Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samplescited by 619
  12. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
13 more
  1. 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
  2. 2023Florence-2: Advancing a Unified Representation for a Variety of Vision Taskscited by 403
  3. 2022Scaling Language-Image Pre-training via Maskingcited by 317
  4. 2024Long-CLIP: Unlocking the Long-Text Capability of CLIPcited by 298
  5. 2017Sampling Matters in Deep Embedding Learningcited by 285
  6. 2022CyCLIP: Cyclic Contrastive Language-Image Pretrainingcited by 127
  7. 2024EVA-CLIP-18B: Scaling CLIP to 18 Billion Parameterscited by 99
  8. 2022Perceptual Grouping in Contrastive Vision-Language Modelscited by 82
  9. 2023MLLMs-Augmented Visual-Language Representation Learningcited by 21
  10. 2018Manifold Mixup: Better Representations by Interpolating Hidden Statescited by 14
  11. 2024A Review on Discriminative Self-supervised Learning Methods in Computer Visioncited by 6
  12. 2024SynCo: Synthetic Hard Negatives for Contrastive Visual Representation Learningcited by 5
  13. 2026ViTAMINS: An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformers with Synthetic Hard Negativescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025FALCON: False-Negative Aware Learning of Contrastive Negatives in Vision-Language Alignment
  2. 2024Enhancing Fine-Grained Vision-Language Pretraining with Negative Augmented Samples
  3. 2025Generalizable Vision-Language Few-Shot Adaptation with Predictive Prompts and Negative Learning
  4. 2023Filtering, Distillation, and Hard Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-Training
  5. 2024Enhancing Vision-Language Few-Shot Adaptation with Negative Learning
  6. 2023MAFA: Managing False Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-training
  7. 2026Breaking the Illusion: When Positive Meets Negative in Multimodal Decoding
  8. 2026LeVLJEPA: End-to-End Vision-Language Pretraining Without Negatives