EvoSignal: LLM-Guided Evolutionary Design of Modular Traffic Signal Control Programs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Effective traffic signal control (TSC) requires policies that respond to changing traffic demand and network conditions while meeting different control objectives. However, adapting existing strategies often involves repeated manual design and adjustment, making it difficult to systematically explore better control rules for a target network. Large language models (LLMs) can automate this process, but directly using them to select signal phases leaves decision rules embedded in black-box models and incurs recurring inference costs and latency. This paper formulates TSC as a modular program design problem and proposes EvoSignal, an LLM-guided evolutionary framework using traffic knowledge and performance feedback. The modular representation separates traffic feature extraction, local phase prioritization, and optional network-based priority adjustment. Starting from several established strategies, EvoSignal improves programs through feedback on congestion and signal operation, retaining strategies with different performance trade-offs. The resulting programs operate without online LLM inference. Simulation experiments across five scenarios on two real-world road networks show that the selected default EvoSignal program reduces waiting time by 16.8--49.2% relative to the lowest waiting time achieved by the 20 conventional, reinforcement learning-based, and LLM-based baselines in each scenario. A program prioritizing travel time and queue length outperforms all 20 baselines on all three metrics in the search scenario and remains among the top three on each metric when transferred unchanged to the other four scenarios. These findings support automated design of inspectable control programs that transfer across the evaluated road networks and traffic demands.Code is available at https://github.com/georgewanglz2019/EvoSignal.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.
Builds on
19 of 72 references.
References · 19
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
- 2025AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discoverycited by 763
- 2023Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Modelscited by 542
- 2023Where Would I Go Next? Large Language Models as Human Mobility Predictorscited by 92
7 more
- 2019A Survey on Traffic Signal Control Methodscited by 78
- 2020AttendLight: Universal Attention-Based Reinforcement Learning Model for Traffic Signal Controlcited by 60
- 2024LLM-Assisted Light: Leveraging Large Language Model Capabilities for Human-Mimetic Traffic Signal Control in Complex Urban Environmentscited by 31
- 2021Efficient Pressure: Improving efficiency for signalized intersectionscited by 24
- 2022The Real Deal: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities in Moving Reinforcement Learning-Based Traffic Signal Control Systems Towards Realitycited by 8
- 2025EvolveSignal: A Large Language Model Powered Coding Agent for Discovering Traffic Signal Control Strategiescited by 1
- 2026SignalClaw: LLM-Guided Evolutionary Synthesis of Interpretable Traffic Signal Control Skillscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.