mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Cylindrical Geodesic Flow Matching for Quasiperiodic Physiological Signal Transformation

arXiv 2610.08510 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science also fits: Audio, speech and music

Abstract (arXiv)

Paired translation between quasiperiodic physiological waveforms (i.e., recovering a target oscillatory signal from the source) is central to the interpretation of cardiovascular signals derived from wearables placed at different body locations. This source-to-target mapping in these problems carries inherent geometric structure: the phase wraps around the cycle and must be treated as a circular variable, the amplitude remains strictly positive, and the beat-to-beat alignment can drift unpredictably across cycles and subjects. While deep neural networks have been used for phase estimation and complex-valued signal modeling, prior work does not explicitly learn phase transport between paired signals. Consequently, neither endpoint-supervised regression nor the standard affine path used in flow matching accounts for this phase--amplitude structure. We introduce cylindrical geodesic flow matching for paired cardiovascular waveform translation. We show that the standard affine path used in flow matching distorts intermediate amplitude and instantaneous frequency when interpolating between quasiperiodic signals; replacing it with a closed-form geodesic on the phase--amplitude cylinder eliminates these artifacts and converts each training pair into dense, geometry-consistent velocity supervision. On zero-shot photoplethysmography and limited-support seismocardiography adaptation benchmarks, our method consistently outperforms interpolation baselines and matches or exceeds direct supervised prediction, reducing Hilbert Transform, L2, and Dynamic Time Warping distance by up to ~15% over the strongest competing baseline. These results suggest that bridge geometry is a critical inductive bias for flow matching on oscillatory signal translation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 8 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.

Builds on

8 of 59 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Trajectory Flow Matching with Applications to Clinical Time Series Modeling28 Oct
  2. 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport1 Feb
  3. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct

Other references · 5

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,718
  2. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,028
  3. 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 3,023
  4. 2025FlowECG: Using Flow Matching to Create a More Efficient ECG Signal Generatorcited by 3
  5. 2026PENGUIN: General Vital Sign Reconstruction from PPG with Flow Matching State Space Modelcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Compact Latent Manifold Translation: A Parameter-Efficient Foundation Model for Cross-Modal and Cross-Frequency Physiological Signal Synthesis
  2. 2026Sensor Geometry as a Flow-Matching Prior for Multi-Channel Brain Signals
  3. 2026GeoRVQ: Decoder-aware geometry for residual-token prediction in physiological signals
  4. 2026One Frame, Full Heartbeat: ECG-Free Cardiac Cine MRI Synthesis via Phase-Conditioned Flow Matching
  5. 2026CyFM: Cylindrical Optimal Transport for Few-Step Complex-Valued Flow Matching
  6. 2026B[FM]2: Brain Foundation Model via Flow Matching with SplitUNet
  7. 2026PI-AMFM: Permutation-Invariant Learning for Variable-Cardinality AM-FM Mode Decomposition in Biomedical Signal Analysis
  8. 2026VAMP-Diff: VampPrior Latent Diffusion for Photoplethysmography Modeling