mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Lost in the bf16 Cast: Exporting Ternary Language Models Can Revert Most Low-Learning-Rate Code Changes

arXiv 2610.07853 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ternary language models such as BitNet b1.58, Falcon-E and BitCPM are fine-tuned with higher-precision latent weights and deployed as ternary codes produced by an export step that, in the labs' documented pipelines, first casts the latents to bf16. We audit those pipelines across three labs. In released checkpoints, fp32 quantization of the shipped latents disagrees with the deployed codes on 0.83-1.77% of codes in Falcon-E and BitCPM and on 1.530% in BitNet 2B-4T; for Falcon-E and BitCPM most disagreements are products that bf16 rounding lands exactly on the threshold, which ties-to-even maps to zero, and the unmodified onebitllms exporter reproduces all four Falcon-E releases byte for byte. At fine-tuned endpoints, with learning rates selected to match a nominal learning-rate-to-bf16-ULP ratio, the documented export lowers greedy GSM8K strict accuracy from 58.79% to 0.78% for Falcon-E-1B-Base and from 36.13% to 0.39% for BitCPM-CANN-0.5B, and a bf16 save and reload lowers BitNet 2B-4T's strict accuracy by 27.54 points while its last-number accuracy rises. Two compatibility remedies, writing the training quantizer's codes directly or adjusting the bf16 inputs until the unchanged tools emit them, each met a 4-point strict-accuracy non-inferiority criterion against online evaluation in all three models. In a prospectively frozen study of bf16 latents during fine-tuning (one task, one recipe and trajectory per arm), native bf16 writes left 2B-4T's codes unchanged at the endpoint and changed one Falcon-E code, while emulated stochastic-rounding and compensated writers changed codes and were non-inferior to fp32 training at the same margin in both models. In two model families, randomized interventions on the initial distance from the threshold support distance-dependent selection of the codes that fine-tuning changes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2026.

Builds on

26 of 36 references.

References · 26

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  3. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  4. 2020Up or Down? Adaptive Rounding for Post-Training Quantizationcited by 621
  5. 2024The Era of 1-bit LLMs: All Large Language Models are in 1.58 Bitscited by 308
  6. 2019A Study of BFLOAT16 for Deep Learning Trainingcited by 232
  7. 2022Overcoming Oscillations in Quantization-Aware Trainingcited by 119
  8. 2019Latent Weights Do Not Exist: Rethinking Binarized Neural Network Optimizationcited by 60
  9. 2023Oscillation-free Quantization for Low-bit Vision Transformerscited by 57
  10. 2023FlexRound: Learnable Rounding based on Element-wise Division for Post-Training Quantizationcited by 48
  11. 2025BitNet b1.58 2B4T Technical Reportcited by 38
  12. 2024MagR: Weight Magnitude Reduction for Enhancing Post-Training Quantizationcited by 28
14 more
  1. 2020Revisiting BFloat16 Trainingcited by 17
  2. 2025Tequila: Trapping-free Ternary Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 9
  3. 2026Understanding and Exploiting Weight Update Sparsity for Communication-Efficient Distributed RLcited by 7
  4. 2024Direct Quantized Training of Language Models with Stochastic Roundingcited by 6
  5. 2026ECO: Quantized Training without Full-Precision Master Weightscited by 5
  6. 2024Scheduling Weight Transitions for Quantization-Aware Trainingcited by 2
  7. 2020Synaptic Metaplasticity in Binarized Neural Networkscited by 1
  8. 2026DAQ: Delta-Aware Quantization for Post-Training LLM Weight Compressioncited by 1
  9. 2026In-Cell Learning: Language Models That Update Their Own Weights in Sequence Without Changing the File They Shipcited by 1
  10. 2026Fine-Tuning Low-Bit Models with Gradient in Quantized Code Spacecited by 1
  11. 2026Scale-QLoRA: Code-Invariant Adapter Merging for Native 4-bit Microscaling LLMscited by 1
  12. 2026Beyond Shadow Weights: Quantization-Aware Training as Quantized-Endpoint Descentcited by 1
  13. 2026TerMeZO: Ternary Sparse Zeroth-Order Optimization for Fine-tuning BitNet Models at the Edgecited by 1
  14. 2026QATFactory: A Versatile, Deployment-Aligned Framework for Quantization-aware Training and Distillation of LLMscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Breaking the 1.58-bit Barrier for Ternary LLMs
  2. 2026Capability-Stratified Degradation in Ternary Language Models
  3. 2026Scaling Post-Training Ternarisation to Qwen3-8B Capability Retention, Reproduction, Lossless Packing, and Packed Execution
  4. 2026Post-Training Ternarization of Qwen3-4B Capability, Effective Bit Budget, Storage Compression, and Deployment
  5. 2026Quantization-Aware Healing: A Practical Recipe for Recovering Compressed, 4-Bit LLMs
  6. 2026Quantization Undoes Alignment: Bias Emergence in Compressed LLMs Across Models and Precision Levels
  7. 2025An Extra RMSNorm is All You Need for Fine Tuning to 1.58 Bits
  8. 2026Not All 4-bit Quantizers Are Equal: Deployment-Time Mitigation of PII Leakage in Fine-Tuned Small Language Models