mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semantic Capability Acquisition and Specialization During Vision-Language Model Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2610.07385 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP also fits: VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuning vision-language models (VLMs) is typically evaluated at a single downstream checkpoint, obscuring whether a semantic capability was never acquired or emerged earlier and later declined during specialization. We ask how semantic capabilities are acquired, when they peak, how well they transfer, and what remains at deployment. We study these dynamics as a semantic capability trajectory, tracking identity- and attribute-based capabilities over training. We formulate a trajectory-based framework that separates capability acquisition, capability-specific optima, and later specialization, and introduce Structured Semantic Routing (SSR) to study how the representation of supervision shapes what is acquired. Across six pretrained backbones spanning DFN, MetaCLIP, and OpenAI CLIP, we show that fine-tuning can acquire semantic capability beyond the pretrained state, including gains observed on held-out evaluations. Unstructured name-and-attribute supervision produces strong name-and-attribute retrieval with comparatively weak name-free attribute-profile retrieval, whereas SSR yields substantially stronger name-free attribute-profile retrieval and is further strengthened by stochastic name-branch dropout. Different capabilities can peak at different stages, so a checkpoint selected by target class-name retrieval need not coincide with a transferable semantic optimum. Continued optimization can therefore preserve strong target class-name retrieval while reducing previously acquired transferable semantic capability. In a representative diagnostic study, this late specialization is consistent with reduced cross-modal semantic accessibility while substantial image-only class structure remains available.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Uncovering Intrinsic Capabilities: A Paradigm for Data Curation in Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026What Transfers from Text to Vision? Capability Scaling Laws and Transfer Dynamics for VLMs
  3. 2025Keep the General, Inject the Specific: Structured Dialogue Fine-Tuning for Knowledge Injection without Catastrophic Forgetting
  4. 2024Understanding Retrieval-Augmented Task Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Unveiling the Compositional Ability Gap in Vision-Language Reasoning Model
  6. 2026Diagnosing the Sources of Compositional Failure in Vision-Language Models: A Controlled Analysis
  7. 2023ArGue: Attribute-Guided Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  8. 2026Seeing Beyond Redundancy: Task Complexity's Role in Vision Token Specialization in VLLMs