mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DART-ES: Difficulty-Aware Reweighting and Targeted Replay for Fine-Tuning LLMs with Evolution Strategies

arXiv 2610.06993 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking also fits: Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Evolution Strategies (ES) enable memory efficient full parameter fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) using only forward computation. However, standard ES uniformly averages rewards across problems and compresses problem level population feedback into a single scalar, making it difficult to capture how the learning value of each problem changes with model capability. To address this limitation, we propose Difficulty-Aware Reweighting and Targeted Replay for Evolution Strategies (DART-ES). DART-ES estimates the local solvability of each problem from its pass rate across the perturbation population and aggregates historical observations to construct a dynamic difficulty state. This shared state jointly guides continuous difficulty reweighting and rare solvable sample replay, thereby improving perturbation direction evaluation and training data allocation without introducing an additional difficulty model or backpropagation. Extensive experiments show that DART-ES achieves good fine-tuning performance. DART-ES outperforms ES on all five base models and improves the average accuracy from 72.07% to 73.53%, exceeding the 73.26% achieved by GRPO on GSM8K. Across five challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks, DART-ES achieves an average accuracy of 49.20%, compared with 48.34% for ES and remains competitive with strong 7B models trained with RL. Further experiments show consistent gains in instruction tuning, code generation and the Countdown task with a 14B model, demonstrating strong generalization across tasks and scalability to larger models. Beyond performance gains, DART-ES also shows clear advantages in system efficiency. It reduces runtime per step by 15.2%--50.2% and peak memory usage per GPU by 21.1%--51.1% compared with GRPO. Despite performing full parameter fine-tuning, DART-ES also requires less runtime and GPU memory than GRPO+LoRA.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Evolution Strategies at Scale: LLM Fine-Tuning Beyond Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2025DART: Difficulty-Adaptive Reasoning Truncation for Efficient Large Language Models
  3. 2026DIVE: Unlocking Self-Improvement in Frozen Language Models Through Diversity-Driven Skill Evolution
  4. 2026ESSAM: A Novel Competitive Evolution Strategies Approach to Reinforcement Learning for Memory Efficient LLMs Fine-Tuning
  5. 2025Beyond Templates: Dynamic Adaptation of Reasoning Demonstrations via Feasibility-Aware Exploration
  6. 2026StraTune: Adaptive Selection of Revision Operators for Self-Evolving LLM Skills
  7. 2025Improving Data Efficiency for LLM Reinforcement Fine-tuning Through Difficulty-targeted Online Data Selection and Rollout Replay
  8. 2026STRETCH the Boundaries: A Unified Self-Taught Framework for Progressive LLM Evolution