mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MercerFlow: Flow Matching in a Kernel-Induced Latent Space for Probabilistic Forecasting

arXiv 2610.06039 ↗First posted 5 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work has shown that probabilistic flow matching for time series forecasting benefits from a data-matched prior. The resulting prior introduces local correlations, which a sequential architecture usually absorbs: a recurrent neural network (RNN), a structured state-space model (S4), or a Transformer. However, such a backbone costs GPU memory and time per epoch. A cheaper alternative is MLP-based latent-space flow matching: embed the time series via an invertible map to a single latent vector and learn the flow there, so a tabular MLP can treat the series as a set of features. The relationship between the prior and the choice of linear latent map is understudied in conditional flow matching (CFM) forecasting, yet we found it strongly affects performance. Fixed transforms such as Fourier or discrete cosine (DCT) are only well-conditioned for Ornstein--Uhlenbeck priors, while a principal-component (PCA) map fit to the data is a strong but training-set-dependent reference sensitive to train--test shift. Instead, we propose to use the Mercer eigenbasis of the prior kernel: it diagonalises the centred covariance exactly, decouples from training data, and adapts to non-stationary and periodic priors. On five GluonTS benchmarks (ETTh1, ETTh2, Weather, Electricity, Traffic) under a shared protocol with TSFlow, the resulting MLP matches or beats it on CRPS at about 4.7× less training memory and 3.5×--4.4× less time per epoch.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Probabilistic Forecasting via Autoregressive Flow Matching
  2. 2024Flow Matching with Gaussian Process Priors for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting
  3. 2026ProtoFlow: Prototype-Guided Flow Matching for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting
  4. 2024Elucidating the Design Choice of Probability Paths in Flow Matching for Forecasting
  5. 2025Bridging the Last Mile of Prediction: Enhancing Time Series Forecasting with Conditional Guided Flow Matching
  6. 2024Stream-level flow matching with Gaussian processes
  7. 2025Generating ensembles of spatially-coherent in-situ forecasts using flow matching
  8. 2025Operator Flow Matching for Timeseries Forecasting