Prompt and Refinement: Asymmetric Mutual Learning for Infrared Small Target Detection with Noisy Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing data-driven infrared small target detection (ISTD) methods typically require large-scale datasets with accurate pixel-level annotations for model training. However, such labor-intensive requirements are difficult to satisfy in real-world applications due to the heavy reliance on expert knowledge and the inherently weak distinctiveness of infrared small targets. Consequently, the presence of noisy labels during model training is inevitable, which can severely mislead the learning of target perception toward spurious patterns. To address this challenge, we propose Prompt and Refinement (PAR), a label-noise-robust asymmetric mutual learning paradigm for ISTD. Specifically, PAR comprises a pretrained Segment Anything Model (SAM) and an ISTD-specific detector trained from scratch, which learn collaboratively through a peer-teaching scheme. Coupled with local contrast regularity, the predictions of the two asymmetric peer models are mutually exploited as rectification cues for the supervisory masks of their counterparts. The interaction between complementary inductive biases effectively prevents the label correction process from degenerating into the self-confirmation loop of a single model, enabling progressive refinement of the annotations toward intrinsic target characteristics. In addition, the detector predictions are utilized as corrective mask prompts to facilitate task-specific adaptation of the vision foundation model. Moreover, an evidential uncertainty estimation strategy is introduced into the optimization process to further alleviate the adverse effects of noisy labels. Extensive experiments under diverse noisy label scenarios on three ISTD datasets demonstrate that PAR consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.
Builds on
37 of 73 references.
References · 37
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,292
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
- 2017Deep Mutual Learningcited by 628
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
- 2022Vision Transformers for Single Image Dehazingcited by 260
- 2020Asymmetric Contextual Modulation for Infrared Small Target Detectioncited by 138
- 2021Dense Nested Attention Network for Infrared Small Target Detectioncited by 135
25 more
- 2022UIU-Net: U-Net in U-Net for Infrared Small Object Detectioncited by 127
- 2024Infrared Small Target Detection with Scale and Location Sensitivitycited by 73
- 2019Robust Inference via Generative Classifiers for Handling Noisy Labelscited by 68
- 2021Adaptive Early-Learning Correction for Segmentation from Noisy Annotationscited by 62
- 2024SCTransNet: Spatial-channel Cross Transformer Network for Infrared Small Target Detectioncited by 62
- 2021Co-learning: Learning from Noisy Labels with Self-supervisioncited by 51
- 2023Mapping Degeneration Meets Label Evolution: Learning Infrared Small Target Detection with Single Point Supervisioncited by 51
- 2022MTU-Net: Multi-level TransUNet for Space-based Infrared Tiny Ship Detectioncited by 48
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 39
- 2024Pinwheel-shaped Convolution and Scale-based Dynamic Loss for Infrared Small Target Detectioncited by 34
- 2021Uncertainty Estimation via Response Scaling for Pseudo-mask Noise Mitigation in Weakly-supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 29
- 2018A Two-Stream Mutual Attention Network for Semi-supervised Biomedical Segmentation with Noisy Labelscited by 27
- 2024Learnable Prompting SAM-induced Knowledge Distillation for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentationcited by 23
- 2021Adaptive Sample Selection for Robust Learning under Label Noisecited by 21
- 2023Monte Carlo Linear Clustering with Single-Point Supervision is Enough for Infrared Small Target Detectioncited by 20
- 2023Learning to Segment from Noisy Annotations: A Spatial Correction Approachcited by 17
- 2023Robust T-Loss for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 14
- 2021MutualNet: Adaptive ConvNet via Mutual Learning from Different Model Configurationscited by 13
- 2024From Easy to Hard: Progressive Active Learning Framework for Infrared Small Target Detection with Single Point Supervisioncited by 12
- 2024AIO2: Online Correction of Object Labels for Deep Learning with Incomplete Annotation in Remote Sensing Image Segmentationcited by 10
- 2024Dirichlet-Based Prediction Calibration for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 8
- 2025A Mutual Learning Method for Salient Object Detection with intertwined Multi-Supervision--Revisedcited by 6
- 2020Improving Domain-Adapted Sentiment Classification by Deep Adversarial Mutual Learningcited by 5
- 2024Refined Infrared Small Target Detection Scheme with Single-Point Supervisioncited by 4
- 2025Collaborative Learning of Scattering and Deep Features for SAR Target Recognition with Noisy Labelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.