Toward AI Trustworthiness: Finding Analytically Proven Forward-Invariant Sets for AI-Controlled Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural-network (NN) controllers are increasingly used in nonlinear control systems, but their highly nonlinear behavior makes them difficult to explain and verify, raising trustworthiness concerns in safety- and mission-critical applications. A key step toward certifiable trustworthiness is to find a Forward-Invariant Set (FIS): a state-space region such that any trajectory starting inside remains inside. If the FIS excludes unsafe states, safety can be guaranteed for initial states within it. Finding an analytically proven FIS for a given AI-controlled system with a fixed controller is difficult. We propose a framework that uses an Invertible Neural Network (INN) to transform the original state space into a latent space where a regular-shaped FIS is more likely to exist. We train the INN so that a preferred hyper-rectangular candidate becomes invariant in the latent space, then formally verify it. We prove that, whenever verification succeeds, both the latent-space candidate and its inverse-transformed counterpart in the original state space are analytically proven FISs. We evaluate the approach on 45 AI-controlled systems across three representative control testbeds. Our method finds certified FISs for all 45 systems, whereas an adapted state-of-the-art baseline finds none. It is also faster on 40 of the 45 systems, and the centers of the resulting FISs roughly match domain-expert preferences.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.
Builds on
19 of 46 references.
References · 19
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
- 2019Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robotscited by 504
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
- 2016Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systemscited by 287
- 2016A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-driving Urban Vehiclescited by 254
- 2021Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verificationcited by 228
- 2020Fast and Complete: Enabling Complete Neural Network Verification with Rapid and Massively Parallel Incomplete Verifierscited by 187
- 2023Real-World Humanoid Locomotion with Reinforcement Learningcited by 187
- 2018A Tour of Reinforcement Learning: The View from Continuous Controlcited by 151
- 2020Stability Analysis using Quadratic Constraints for Systems with Neural Network Controllerscited by 44
7 more
- 2022Neural Lyapunov Control of Unknown Nonlinear Systems with Stability Guaranteescited by 40
- 2021OVERT: An Algorithm for Safety Verification of Neural Network Control Policies for Nonlinear Systemscited by 38
- 2024Lyapunov-stable Neural Control for State and Output Feedback: A Novel Formulationcited by 25
- 2023Neural Lyapunov Control for Discrete-Time Systemscited by 23
- 2024Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability in Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 16
- 2022Stability Verification of Neural Network Controllers using Mixed-Integer Programmingcited by 11
- 2023Forward Invariance in Neural Network Controlled Systemscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.