mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Look Before You Leap: Thermodynamic Arbitration of Parametric and Non-Parametric Knowledge in LLM Agents via Self-Regulating Memory Architectures

arXiv 2610.05223 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems

Abstract (arXiv)

The architecture of modern LLMs consists of a profound cognitive polarization. LLMs possess implicit intuition encoded in their parameters, yet rely on a disconnected, explicit mechanism to access the outside world. Agentic frameworks have not bridged this gap; instead, models are often compelled into pathological "induced amnesia." Under the prevailing "Retrieve-Always" paradigm, agents must distrust their internal knowledge, making every user interaction a "tabula rasa" event that must be checked externally. This creates reflexive dependence that can be thermodynamically wasteful, cognitively fragile, and susceptible to irrelevant context. We propose a return to first principles, operationalizing the biological maxim "Look Before You Leap." We introduce MARTA (Metacognitive Adaptive Retrieval and Thought Architecture), a neuro-symbolic framework that bridges parametric and non-parametric knowledge. Rather than treating retrieval as mandatory, MARTA models it as a cost, taking the leap only when perceived internal inadequacy warrants external information. By allowing the agent to gauge the entropy of its own thoughts before acting, MARTA enables deliberative retrieval and uncertainty-aware decision making. Our approach suggests that giving agents the capacity for introspection can restore a more efficient balance between internal knowledge and external information.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.

Builds on

13 of 19 references.

References · 13

  1. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
  2. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  4. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
  5. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
  6. 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
  7. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
  8. 2023Active Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 516
  9. 2023Augmented Language Models: a Surveycited by 403
  10. 2024Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 197
  11. 2024MAQA: Evaluating Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs Regarding Data Uncertaintycited by 27
  12. 2024Accelerating Manufacturing Scale-Up from Material Discovery Using Agentic Web Navigation and Retrieval-Augmented AI for Process Engineering Schematics Designcited by 6
1 more
  1. 2025Scaling Test-Time Inference with Policy-Optimized, Dynamic Retrieval-Augmented Generation via KV Caching and Decodingcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Human-Like Lifelong Memory: A Neuroscience-Grounded Architecture for Infinite Interaction
  2. 2026The AI Hippocampus: How Far are We From Human Memory?
  3. 2026Contextual Agentic Memory is a Memo, Not True Memory
  4. 2025AI Meets Brain: Memory Systems from Cognitive Neuroscience to Autonomous Agents
  5. 2026Memory Beyond Recall: A Dual-Process Cognitive Memory System for Self-Evolving LLM Agents
  6. 2026Learning What to Remember: A Cognitively Grounded Multi-Factor Value Model for Agentic Memory
  7. 2026Keep It InMind: Benchmarking the Implicit-Association Blind Spot in Agent Memory
  8. 2026Beyond the Shadows of Plato's Cave: Evaluating False Memory in Autonomous Agents via Counterfactual Reasoning