CI-JEPA: A Counterfactual Analysis of Latent Representations in Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures for Self-Supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-supervised visual representation learning learns useful features without manual annotations during representation training. The image-based joint-embedding predictive architecture (I-JEPA) predicts latent representations of masked image regions, but its objective does not explicitly model responses to specified visual interventions. We introduce CI-JEPA, a counterfactual intervention-aware extension that learns to predict the representation change Delta Z = ZCF - Z between an original image and a modified counterpart. We assess representation robustness through selective sensitivity: stronger responses to task-relevant semantic changes than to nuisance changes. Experiments on Flowers102 use flower-center occlusion as a candidate semantic intervention and background blur and tint as candidate nuisance interventions. With frozen-encoder linear probing, CI-JEPA achieves a best validation accuracy of 78.14%, compared with 77.55% for both the pretrained ViT-B/16 and the I-JEPA baseline, a gain of 0.59 percentage points. The reported mean L2 representation changes are 4.42 for center occlusion, 3.48 for background tint, and 2.83 for background blur. This ordering is consistent with relative semantic selectivity for the evaluated interventions, rather than complete nuisance invariance. The accuracy comparison is complementary and does not establish improved robustness over the baselines. These controlled image modifications provide a framework for studying intervention-induced changes in JEPA representations; they do not establish causal feature discovery or robustness to all visual changes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.
Builds on
11 of 14 references.
References · 11
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,039
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 343
- 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 313
- 2016Generating Visual Explanationscited by 158
- 2022Interventional Causal Representation Learningcited by 142
- 2020CausalVAE: Structured Causal Disentanglement in Variational Autoencodercited by 48
Built on by
Not cited yet.