mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

R2-WAM: Repair-and-Reject Post-Training for World Action Models

arXiv 2610.04913 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2026cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: World models → Embodied and robot world models

Abstract (arXiv)

World Action Models (WAMs) emerge as a promising foundation for policy refinement by predicting the consequences of sampled actions. However, visually plausible predictions can mislead policy refinement if they fail to reflect the input actions. To address this mismatch, we introduce R2-WAM, a two-stage repair-and-reject post-training framework that first improves the consistency of predicted futures with input actions, then uses these futures to select inferior action samples for negative fine-tuning. The repair stage grounds imagination in observed robot behavior through a kinematic alignment score that measures agreement between predicted and demonstrated motion, enabling the predicted video to faithfully reflect its input actions. Using the repaired video model, the rejection stage compares imagined outcomes of sampled and demonstrated actions, selectively applying negative fine-tuning to samples whose predicted task progress falls below the demonstrated reference by a prescribed margin. Together, the two stages extend video prediction from representation learning to consequence-based policy refinement without additional environment interaction or changes to the inference procedure. R2-WAM achieves 93.8% average success on RoboTwin 2.0 across clean and randomized settings. On the long-horizon real-world Fold Shirt task, it achieves 87.5% average success, compared with 0% for Fast-WAM. Our project page is available at https://r2-wam.github.io/.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and robot world models, one of 11 directions in World models. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026EVO-WAM: Evolving World Action Models through Video-Action Verification
  2. 2026Achieve What You Imagined: Learning to Align Actions with Visual Plans
  3. 2026Vid2WAM: Distilling Video Diffusion Priors into World Action Models
  4. 2026Do Robotic World Models Really Follow Actions? Diagnosing and Aligning Action-Conditioned Generation for Policy Learning
  5. 2026WAM-OPD: On-Policy Distillation for World Action Models
  6. 2026Enhancing Policy Learning with World-Action Model
  7. 2026Hi-WM: Human-in-the-World-Model for Scalable Robot Post-Training
  8. 2026τ0-WM: A Unified Video-Action World Model for Robotic Manipulation