mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Tropical Geometry View of Forgetting: A Per-Unit Projector for Knowledge-Preserving Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2610.04670 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuning a language model on new text degrades what it already does. Replay-free projectors such as Adam-NSCL and GPM forbid one shared subspace of a layer's inputs in every row of the update. The tropical geometry of a ReLU layer shows why this is too coarse. In data space, the units' walls are tropical hypersurfaces whose cells are dual to the upper vertices of a zonotope; in weight space, each old token is a hyperplane, and the tokens cut out a polyhedron, the closure of the weights that keep every token on its side. An exact identity joins the two pictures: the squared change of the layer's output under any weight change splits into in-cell, open-to-closed and closed-to-open terms, and the first two live on the tokens each unit fires on. The identity names a gate-aware per-unit projector, and a budget-separation theorem prices exact protection: it costs a unit the rank of its own open tokens, while a shared subspace pays at least the rank of their union in every row. On OPT-1.3b, where 96% of (token, unit) pairs are closed, the projector forgets less than Adam-NSCL at all six matched budgets from 9 to 60 constrained directions per row, the gap widening from 1.1× to 4.3×; with 1/5.5 of the directions it halves the forgetting of Adam-NSCL at GPM's energy threshold. On OPT-6.7b, it matches Adam-NSCL's forgetting at matched budget while learning more. As the theory predicts, the open/closed partition is the operative variable: open tokens beat random, sign-blind and anti-gate token sets on 18 of 18 seed-pairs. In pruning repair, every derivative-based local model of the output error at the dense weights is blind to pairs that open: the minimisers of the gate-weighted objective can leave the polyhedron, the objective's closed-form solution is 1.94 nats worse than no repair on OPT-1.3b, and a convex one-sided penalty bounds the escape.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.

Builds on

47 of 62 references.

References · 47

  1. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  3. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  4. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
  5. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  6. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  7. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  8. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
  9. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
  10. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  11. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
  12. 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 992
35 more
  1. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
  2. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  3. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
  4. 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 765
  5. 2018Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the taskcited by 681
  6. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 659
  7. 2021BRECQ: Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization by Block Reconstructioncited by 479
  8. 2014On the Number of Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 381
  9. 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 369
  10. 2021Gradient Projection Memory for Continual Learningcited by 348
  11. 2024LoRA Learns Less and Forgets Lesscited by 328
  12. 2023Orthogonal Subspace Learning for Language Model Continual Learningcited by 312
  13. 2018Knowledge Transfer via Distillation of Activation Boundaries Formed by Hidden Neuronscited by 238
  14. 2024AlphaEdit: Null-Space Constrained Knowledge Editing for Language Modelscited by 236
  15. 2024InfLoRA: Interference-Free Low-Rank Adaptation for Continual Learningcited by 198
  16. 2021Training Networks in Null Space of Feature Covariance for Continual Learningcited by 143
  17. 2017Practical Gauss-Newton Optimisation for Deep Learningcited by 142
  18. 2024Simple and Scalable Strategies to Continually Pre-train Large Language Modelscited by 127
  19. 2020Continual Learning with Node-Importance based Adaptive Group Sparse Regularizationcited by 105
  20. 2020Neural Networks are Convex Regularizers: Exact Polynomial-time Convex Optimization Formulations for Two-layer Networkscited by 98
  21. 2023Fine-tuning can cripple your foundation model; preserving features may be the solutioncited by 96
  22. 2018Tropical Geometry of Deep Neural Networkscited by 95
  23. 2023ReLU Strikes Back: Exploiting Activation Sparsity in Large Language Modelscited by 94
  24. 2022TRGP: Trust Region Gradient Projection for Continual Learningcited by 82
  25. 2023The MiniPile Challenge for Data-Efficient Language Modelscited by 75
  26. 2024ProSparse: Introducing and Enhancing Intrinsic Activation Sparsity within Large Language Modelscited by 45
  27. 2023Continual Learning with Scaled Gradient Projectioncited by 34
  28. 2025GuidedQuant: Large Language Model Quantization via Exploiting End Loss Guidancecited by 32
  29. 2022Balancing Stability and Plasticity through Advanced Null Space in Continual Learningcited by 30
  30. 2024Unlocking Continual Learning Abilities in Language Modelscited by 23
  31. 2024Neuron-Level Sequential Editing for Large Language Modelscited by 20
  32. 2022Sparsity and Heterogeneous Dropout for Continual Learning in the Null Space of Neural Activationscited by 19
  33. 2025Precise Localization of Memories: A Fine-grained Neuron-level Knowledge Editing Technique for LLMscited by 18
  34. 2025Put the Space of LoRA Initialization to the Extreme to Preserve Pre-trained Knowledgecited by 16
  35. 2023Architecture-Preserving Provable Repair of Deep Neural Networkscited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.