mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What to Preserve in Recursive Computation: A Local Predictive Sufficiency Principle

arXiv 2610.04303 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recursive computation repeatedly compresses or reuses intermediate states, creating a simple tension: information that must remain useful across longer recursive paths is also exposed to more opportunities for loss before reaching the final prediction. Existing reconstruction or local-prediction objectives provide tractable supervision, but do not ensure that the retained information remains sufficient for subsequent recursive computation. We identify local predictive sufficiency with recursive predictive closure: controlling local predictive deficiencies at individual interfaces controls the resulting discrepancy at the root. We then turn this principle into a tractable training procedure. Starting from a variational characterization, we derive finite predictive tests and an empirical predictive deficiency that measures predictive value retained across compression. Its predictive sensitivities define margin-relaxed half-space constraints on parameter updates, and we project the host optimizer's proposed update onto their intersection only when predictive preservation would otherwise be violated. Across temporal graphs, language memory, vision-language-action control, and recursive self-improvement, the method matches or improves the corresponding host models under matched compression budgets, with larger gains under heavier recursive or memory demands, while better preserving predictive information across successive transformations. Crucially, the same task-agnostic predictive-preservation principle is instantiated across all four settings through host-compatible interventions while keeping the endpoint task, backbone, and evaluation protocol fixed. These results establish predictive preservation at recursive interfaces as a general training principle for recursive compression.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026What Survives When You Compress a Recursive Reasoner for the Edge?
  2. 2026Dense Supervision Is Not Enough: The Readout Blind Spot in Looped Language Models
  3. 2026The Predictive-Causal Gap: An Impossibility Theorem and Large-Scale Neural Evidence
  4. 2026Self-Reference in Large Language Models: The Introspection Threshold for Recursive Self-Improvement
  5. 2026Toward Reliable Context Compression for Long-Horizon Agents: An Empirical Study of Execution Instability
  6. 2026Retraining Seeks Stable Signals
  7. 2026The Surprising Effectiveness of Shared Memory in Looped Transformers
  8. 2026Energy-guided Recursive Model