One-Cycle Fault Classification and Faulted-Line Identification on the PROTECT-90 Dataset: An Initial Application Benchmark
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Open electromagnetic-transient datasets are beginning to make reproducible learning-based protection studies possible, but the practical use of these datasets still requires application-level benchmarks that define timing, sensing, and validation assumptions. This paper presents an initial application benchmark on the recently released PROTECT-90 dataset for two protection-oriented tasks: fault-type classification and discrete faulted-line identification. A compact one-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) is evaluated using post-inception windows of 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 cycles under strict episode-wise splitting. A non-convolutional multilayer perceptron (MLP) is also trained as an architecture-control baseline. The results show that both tasks are nearly saturated under full observability, with one-cycle test accuracies of 99.84% for fault type and 100.00% for line identification. The main performance variation appears under reduced observability: current-only inputs preserve line identification accuracy at 100.00%, whereas voltage-only inputs reduce line identification accuracy to 53.09% with the CNN and 50.57% with the MLP. This indicates that the limiting factor is measurement information rather than neural architecture. Additional stratified checks show stable performance across topology states and fault-resistance bins, while CPU inference contributes only 0.528 ms to the one-cycle total decision time of 20.53 ms.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.
Builds on
8 of 8 references.
References · 8
- 2025A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Applications in Power System Protection and Disturbance Managementcited by 9
- 2025Robustness Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Fault Classification and Localization In Power System Protectioncited by 5
- 2025Controlled Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Fault Classification and Localization in Power System Protectioncited by 4
- 2026PROTECT-90: A Fault Dataset for Power System Protectioncited by 4
- 2026Latency-Aware Deep Learning Benchmark for Real-Time Cyber-Physical Attack and Fault Classification in Inverter-Dominated Power Gridscited by 3
- 2026A Systematic Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for Fault Detection and Line Identification in Electrical Power Gridscited by 3
- 2026Transformer is All You Need: Attention-Based Anomaly Detection and Classification in Inverter-Rich Power Systemscited by 2
- 2025The Wisdom of the Crowd: High-Fidelity Classification of Cyber-Attacks and Faults in Power Systems Using Ensemble and Machine Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.