Representation-Aligned Auxiliary Supervision for Language Model Adaptation
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning also fits: Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, yet adapting them to structured domains remains challenging and can yield inconsistent outcomes. We identify representation compatibility, the extent to which a model effectively processes a representation for a structured task, as a key factor in adaptation. We study this in chess, which provides a controlled testbed with precise semantics, computable optimal actions, and multiple state representations, including a symbolic encoding (FEN) and a spatial format (ASCII). We find that models often process semantically equivalent inputs substantially differently, affecting both learning and generalization. Building on this observation, we propose representation-aligned auxiliary supervision, which uses environment-derived tasks expressed in compatible representations to improve adaptation to structured domains. Across models and representations, auxiliary supervision consistently improves optimal-move prediction relative to target-only training under identical target data. Tasks that expose environment dynamics provide larger and most consistent gains than surface-level or static supervision, while remaining competitive with substantially increasing the amount of target-task data. Moreover, ASCII-trained models transfer more effectively to FEN than FEN-trained models do to ASCII, even surpassing the FEN target-only baseline on FEN evaluation. The gains also extend beyond optimal-move prediction to open-ended, factually grounded commentary generation. Overall, our results show that auxiliary supervision in model-compatible representations can enable effective adaptation in structured domains.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Disentangling generalization and memorization in large language models using chess
- 2026How Reasoning Evolves from Post-Training Data: An Empirical Study Using Chess
- 2024Emergent World Models and Latent Variable Estimation in Chess-Playing Language Models
- 2026A Systematic Study of Small Language Models on Abstract Reasoning Tasks
- 2026Grounded Chess Reasoning in Language Models via Master Distillation
- 2026Understanding Reasoning from Pretraining to Post-Training
- 2025Tracking World States with Language Models: State-Based Evaluation Using Chess
- 2026Correct Answers from Sound Reasoning: Verifiable Process Supervision for Language Models