mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Broken scale symmetries in undercomplete linear autoencoders

arXiv 2610.03640 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.LG q-bio.NC stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural network loss landscapes have many symmetries, which are preserved by gradient flow but broken by finite-stepsize stochastic gradient descent (SGD). A canonical example of such a symmetry is scale in homogeneous networks: one can scale up the parameters in one layer and down in the next without changing the network output. Previous work has documented cases in which SGD breaks this symmetry in favor of balancing gradient noise or minimizing fluctuations. Here, we show that the solution geometry of undercomplete linear autoencoders instead selects a preferred sign for scale drift: on the PCA solution manifold, SGD favors large decoder weights. This directed scale drift occurs on a slow timescale, and its dynamics admit an analytically-tractable effective description. However, it cannot continue indefinitely: increasing scale eventually drives the dynamics towards a finite-stepsize stability boundary. The resulting solutions are sharper than a balanced baseline in the sense of the maximum eigenvalue of the loss Hessian, but different sharpness measures can move in opposing directions. Thus, undercomplete autoencoders give a concrete illustration of how loss geometry can convert residual gradient noise into directed motion along a manifold of functionally-equivalent solutions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

16 of 20 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 466
  2. 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 427
  3. 2018Algorithmic Regularization in Learning Deep Homogeneous Models: Layers are Automatically Balancedcited by 177
  4. 2022Self-Stabilization: The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 155
  5. 2021What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Frameworkcited by 107
  6. 2020Neural Mechanics: Symmetry and Broken Conservation Laws in Deep Learning Dynamicscited by 96
  7. 2024Understanding Optimization in Deep Learning with Central Flowscited by 64
  8. 2021Noether's Learning Dynamics: Role of Symmetry Breaking in Neural Networkscited by 50
  9. 2019Loss Landscapes of Regularized Linear Autoencoderscited by 46
  10. 2023Stochastic Collapse: How Gradient Noise Attracts SGD Dynamics Towards Simpler Subnetworkscited by 39
  11. 2024Edge of Stochastic Stability: Revisiting the Edge of Stability for SGDcited by 30
  12. 2025Neural Thermodynamics: Entropic Forces in Deep and Universal Representation Learningcited by 9
4 more
  1. 2023Noise Balance and Stationary Distribution of Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 7
  2. 2023Stochastic Gradient Descent-Induced Drift of Representation in a Two-Layer Neural Networkcited by 6
  3. 2025Contribution of task-irrelevant stimuli to drift of neural representationscited by 2
  4. 2026SGD at the Edge of Stability: Stochastic Stabilization with Large Learning Ratescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.