Contribution of task-irrelevant stimuli to drift of neural representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Biological and artificial learners are inherently exposed to a stream of data and experience throughout their lifetimes and must constantly adapt to, learn from, or selectively ignore the ongoing input. Recent findings reveal that, even when the performance remains stable, the underlying neural representations can change gradually over time, a phenomenon known as representational drift. Studying the different sources of data and noise that may contribute to drift is essential for understanding lifelong learning in neural systems. However, a systematic study of drift across architectures and learning rules, and the connection to task, are missing. Here, in an online learning setup, we characterize drift as a function of data distribution, and specifically show that the learning noise induced by task-irrelevant stimuli, which the agent learns to ignore in a given context, can create long-term drift in the representation of task-relevant stimuli. Using theory and simulations, we demonstrate this phenomenon both in Hebbian-based learning -- Oja's rule and Similarity Matching -- and in stochastic gradient descent applied to autoencoders and a supervised two-layer network. We consistently observe that the drift rate increases with the variance and the dimension of the data in the task-irrelevant subspace. We further show that this yields different qualitative predictions for the geometry and dimension-dependency of drift than those arising from Gaussian synaptic noise. Overall, our study links the structure of stimuli, task, and learning rule to representational drift and could pave the way for using drift as a signal for uncovering underlying computation in the brain.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2025.
Builds on
13 of 43 references.
References · 13
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
- 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 763
- 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 427
- 2017Stochastic Gradient Descent as Approximate Bayesian Inferencecited by 300
- 2017Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGDcited by 273
- 2017Stochastic gradient descent performs variational inference, converges to limit cycles for deep networkscited by 109
- 2021What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Frameworkcited by 107
- 2018Fluctuation-dissipation relations for stochastic gradient descentcited by 48
- 2017Why do similarity matching objectives lead to Hebbian/anti-Hebbian networks?cited by 20
- 2021The Limiting Dynamics of SGD: Modified Loss, Phase Space Oscillations, and Anomalous Diffusioncited by 19
- 2015Network Plasticity as Bayesian Inferencecited by 13
- 2022Continual task learning in natural and artificial agentscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.