mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Benchmarks to Production: A Text-to-SQL System for Complex Financial Data

arXiv 2610.03524 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.DB cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

General-purpose Text-to-SQL systems achieve strong performance on academic benchmarks like Spider and BIRD, where schemas are relatively shallow and column values are often human readable. In production financial databases, where concepts are stored as opaque integer keys rather than human-readable strings, these methods fall below 50%, as even simple queries require multiple joins and filter predicates reference opaque IDs. We present Financial LINking Text-to-SQL (FLINT), a domain-specialized Text-to-SQL system that closes this gap through three key components: (1) a lookup agent that dynamically resolves natural-language concepts to question-specific reference table constraints, (2) embedding-based retrieval of structurally similar query templates from a compact, expert-authored bank, and (3) schema linking that prunes a large table schema to the relevant subset by traversing foreign-key chains, rather than relying on name similarity alone. We evaluate on two datasets totaling 359 questions over production financial schemas. FLINT outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines using the same LLM. The system is deployed in production as part of a financial data retrieval service.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

13 of 17 references.

References · 13

  1. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  2. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 688
  3. 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 477
  4. 2023Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluationcited by 385
  5. 2023RESDSQL: Decoupling Schema Linking and Skeleton Parsing for Text-to-SQLcited by 195
  6. 2024CHESS: Contextual Harnessing for Efficient SQL Synthesiscited by 169
  7. 2023C3: Zero-shot Text-to-SQL with ChatGPTcited by 164
  8. 2023MAC-SQL: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Text-to-SQLcited by 164
  9. 2024CHASE-SQL: Multi-Path Reasoning and Preference Optimized Candidate Selection in Text-to-SQLcited by 138
  10. 2023ScienceBenchmark: A Complex Real-World Benchmark for Evaluating Natural Language to SQL Systemscited by 45
  11. 2025ReFoRCE: A Text-to-SQL Agent with Self-Refinement, Consensus Enforcement, and Column Explorationcited by 37
  12. 2024SM3-Text-to-Query: Synthetic Multi-Model Medical Text-to-Query Benchmarkcited by 14
1 more
  1. 2026FlexSQL: Flexible Exploration and Execution Make Better Text-to-SQL Agentscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.