mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BeeWhere: Segmenting Bumble Bee Colonies to Quantify Behavioral Effects

arXiv 2610.03051 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Social bees are important pollinators that support biodiversity and crop pollination globally and serve as important model systems for collective behavior, but scalable measurement of individual- and colony-level behavior remains difficult in dense, occluded nest environments. Existing monitoring workflows use fiducial tags (e.g., ArUco) to preserve individual identity, yet tag-based tracking can fail when markers are obscured and provide limited information about body extent, spatial context, and untagged individuals. We present BeeWhere, an AI-assisted annotation and analysis workflow that combines ArUco detections with deep-learnt instance segmentations to quantify bumble bee behavior from high-resolution colony images and videos. Using bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) microcolonies as a test case, we annotate 483 frames containing 8,443 bee instances. We additionally annotate pollen balls, nest structures, and chamber boundaries, and train YOLO instance segmentation models for downstream behavioral analysis. Instance segmentations enable quantification of important behavioral metrics based on body contours, including nearest-neighbor distance, proximity to nest structures, spatial occupancy within the nest, and detection counts over time. We apply the BeeWhere models to tag-based tracking in an exploratory validation study assessing the behavioral impacts of neonicotinoid pesticide exposure. BeeWhere increased detection rates compared to tag-based tracking, particularly when bees were partially obscured or under challenging imaging conditions, and also captured treatment-associated changes in bee spatial organization not captured using tag-based tracking alone. These results suggest that instance segmentation can complement fiducial-marker tracking by recovering behaviorally meaningful signals under challenging colony conditions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

12 of 52 references.

References · 12

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  2. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  3. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
  4. 2021ByteTrack: Multi-Object Tracking by Associating Every Detection Boxcited by 823
  5. 2016Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Trackingcited by 692
  6. 2022BoT-SORT: Robust Associations Multi-Pedestrian Trackingcited by 320
  7. 2018Markerless tracking of user-defined features with deep learningcited by 206
  8. 2020Carbontracker: Tracking and Predicting the Carbon Footprint of Training Deep Learning Modelscited by 169
  9. 2026Ultralytics YOLO26: Unified Real-Time End-to-End Vision Modelscited by 57
  10. 2017Towards dense object tracking in a 2D honeybee hivecited by 9
  11. 2026YOLO26: A Comprehensive Architecture Overview and Key Improvementscited by 2
  12. 2021A terrain treadmill to study animal locomotion through large obstaclescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.