mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DNAlign: Dynamic Null-Space Safe Alignment for LLMs

arXiv 2610.02844 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring the safe and reliable deployment of large language models (LLMs) remains a fundamental challenge. Existing safety alignment approaches either incur high computational cost or unintentionally disrupt the model's core knowledge, leading to degraded fluency and factual accuracy on benign tasks. This reveals a persistent trade-off between safety and utility. We propose DNAlign, a lightweight alignment framework that integrates control-theoretic optimization with null-space projection. By treating the LLM as a dynamic system, the proposed framework introduces controllable perturbations to steer generation toward safe behavior. A key component is the projection module, which restricts these perturbations to the harmful-related subspace derived from neutral hidden states, thereby preserving general knowledge and response quality. A value function trained on human preference data adaptively optimizes the control signals to align with human safety preferences. Extensive evaluations across multiple LLM backbones demonstrate that our framework consistently reduces harmful outputs while maintaining fluency, coherence, and factual utility. It achieves superior overall performance compared to prior alignment baselines without sacrificing generation diversity. These results indicate that the proposed framework provides an effective and practically deployable solution for safe LLM alignment. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DNAlign.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025On Almost Surely Safe Alignment of Large Language Models at Inference-Time
  2. 2026Aligned but Fragile: Enhancing LLM Safety Robustness via Zeroth-Order Optimization
  3. 2026Safety at One Shot: Patching Fine-Tuned LLMs with A Single Instance
  4. 2025A Comprehensive Evaluation framework of Alignment Techniques for LLMs
  5. 2025Alignment and Safety in Large Language Models: Safety Mechanisms, Training Paradigms, and Emerging Challenges
  6. 2026An Efficient and Modular Framework for Targeted Harm Mitigation in LLMS
  7. 2026LSSF: Safety Alignment for Large Language Models through Low-Rank Safety Subspace Fusion
  8. 2026Safeguarding LLM Fine-tuning via Push-Pull Distributional Alignment