mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LSSF: Safety Alignment for Large Language Models through Low-Rank Safety Subspace Fusion

arXiv 2602.00038 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2026cs.CY cs.AIcited by 8

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

The safety mechanisms of large language models (LLMs) exhibit notable fragility, as even fine-tuning on datasets without harmful content may still undermine their safety capabilities. Meanwhile, existing safety alignment methods predominantly rely on the fine-tuning process, which inadvertently leads to the increased complexity and computational resources required. To address these issues, we introduce LSSF, a novel safety re-alignment framework with underlineLow-Rank underlineSafety underlineSubspace underlineFusion. Our proposed method exploits the low-rank characteristics of safety information in LLMs by constructing a low-rank projection matrix to extract the principal components of safety vectors. Notably, this projection matrix represents the low-rank safety subspace of the LLMs, which we have observed to remain stable during fine-tuning process and is isolated from the model's general capabilities. These principal components are used to effectively restore safety alignment when combined with fine-tuned LLMs through linear arithmetic. Additionally, to account for the varying encoding densities of safety information across different layers of LLMs, we propose a novel metric called safety singular value entropy. This metric quantifies the encoding density and allows for the dynamic computation of the safety-critical rank for each safety vector. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed post-hoc alignment method can effectively restore the safety alignment of fine-tuned models with minimal impact on their performance in downstream tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 30 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2026.

Builds on

30 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preference20 Jun
  2. 2024Language Models are Homer Simpson! Safety Re-Alignment of Fine-tuned Language Models through Task Arithmetic19 Feb
  3. 2024Assessing the Brittleness of Safety Alignment via Pruning and Low-Rank Modifications7 Feb
  4. 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback19 Oct
  5. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!5 Oct
  6. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul

Other references · 24

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  6. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  7. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  8. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  9. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
  10. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
  11. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
  12. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 795
12 more
  1. 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 679
  2. 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 454
  3. 2023Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructionscited by 377
  4. 2020Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning with Diff Pruningcited by 351
  5. 2024SVD-LLM: Truncation-aware Singular Value Decomposition for Large Language Model Compressioncited by 231
  6. 2023Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Chain of Utterances for Safety-Alignmentcited by 213
  7. 2023Model Breadcrumbs: Scaling Multi-Task Model Merging with Sparse Maskscited by 130
  8. 2024Model Stock: All we need is just a few fine-tuned modelscited by 87
  9. 2021Low-Complexity Probing via Finding Subnetworkscited by 63
  10. 2023LM-Cocktail: Resilient Tuning of Language Models via Model Mergingcited by 44
  11. 2024JAILJUDGE: A Comprehensive Jailbreak Judge Benchmark with Multi-Agent Enhanced Explanation Evaluation Frameworkcited by 44
  12. 2023On the Trustworthiness Landscape of State-of-the-art Generative Models: A Survey and Outlookcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Safety at One Shot: Patching Fine-Tuned LLMs with A Single Instance
  2. 2024Towards Comprehensive Post Safety Alignment of Large Language Models via Safety Patching
  3. 2024Safety Arithmetic: A Framework for Test-time Safety Alignment of Language Models by Steering Parameters and Activations
  4. 2026Aligned but Fragile: Enhancing LLM Safety Robustness via Zeroth-Order Optimization
  5. 2025Turning the Spell Around: Lightweight Alignment Amplification via Rank-One Safety Injection
  6. 2025Safe Pruning LoRA: Robust Distance-Guided Pruning for Safety Alignment in Adaptation of LLMs
  7. 2025The Blessing and Curse of Dimensionality in Safety Alignment
  8. 2024Navigating the Safety Landscape: Measuring Risks in Finetuning Large Language Models