mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

All Work And No Play Makes Jack a Dull Boy: Understanding and Preventing Catastrophic Strategy Collapse in RLVR

arXiv 2610.02835 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

During post-training of large language models (LLMs) with Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), GRPO-style algorithms can exhibit severe late-stage collapse. Prompt-based probing reveals that this is not benign strategic pruning, but a harmful contraction of effective strategy capacity that makes distinct reasoning strategies increasingly inaccessible. To characterize this phenomenon, we define strategies through trajectory-level policy-update interactions and develop a unified theoretical framework combining optimization dynamics and information theory. We prove that major RLVR objectives progressively concentrate probability mass onto a single strategy, while sustaining nontrivial task accuracy requires a minimum strategy capacity. The conflict between these two results provides a mechanistic explanation for catastrophic collapse. We further derive the Mirrored Entanglement Index (MEI) as a lightweight online warning signal. To prevent collapse, we propose Mesh Learning, which exposes multiple reasoning strategies and prevents any single strategy from dominating optimization. Across AIME26, AIME25, MATH-500, GPQA, and LiveCodeBench, Mesh Learning consistently outperforms strong baselines across Qwen and Phi model families, with gains of up to 13.4 pp and 11.5 pp, respectively. These results establish strategy preservation as a key principle for stable RLVR. Code is available at https://github.com/Ayanami-0123/Open-Mesh-Learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025RL-PLUS: Countering Capability Boundary Collapse of LLMs in Reinforcement Learning with Hybrid-policy Optimization
  2. 2025The Reasoning Boundary Paradox: How Reinforcement Learning Constrains Language Models
  3. 2026Boosting LLM Exploration via Weak-Model Guidance in RLVR
  4. 2026Understanding Diversity Collapse in RLVR via the Lens of Overtraining
  5. 2026Nudging Beyond the Comfort Zone: Efficient Strategy-Guided Exploration for RLVR
  6. 2025Rethinking Entropy Interventions in RLVR: An Entropy Change Perspective
  7. 2026Resource-Efficient Reinforcement for Reasoning Large Language Models via Dynamic One-Shot Policy Refinement
  8. 2025The Debate on RLVR Reasoning Capability Boundary: Shrinkage, Expansion, or Both? A Two-Stage Dynamic View