mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Law And Order: Tax Law Autoformalization

arXiv 2610.02792 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Legal systems are increasingly implemented through software, yet scalable methods for translating legal texts into accurate symbolic representations remain underdeveloped. We study this problem through tax law, where forms and filing instructions define large computational structures involving arithmetic, branching, recursion, and tabular reasoning. We propose Law&Order, a neuro-symbolic framework for automatically formalizing tax forms and instructions into executable symbolic programs. Our approach establishes two forms of correspondence between law and logic: structural correspondence, which aligns legal and symbolic components such as cells and schedules, and denotational correspondence, which requires symbolic components to implement the computations specified by their legal counterparts. We combine large language model synthesis with cell-level verification and iterative localized error repair using human-written OpenTaxSolver tax returns. We then evaluate the resulting formalizations on independently authored, held-out TaxCalcBench returns, that are never exposed during generation or repair. Although the most advanced LLM achieves only 66% accuracy, Law&Order achieves 100% cell-level and form-level accuracy on 51 held-out returns, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining LLM-based synthesis with symbolic verification for scalable and verifiable large-scale legal autoformalization compared with using an LLM alone.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

16 of 49 references.

References · 16

  1. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 988
  2. 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 391
  3. 2022Autoformalization with Large Language Modelscited by 263
  4. 2022FOLIO: Natural Language Reasoning with First-Order Logiccited by 235
  5. 2023ProofNet: Autoformalizing and Formally Proving Undergraduate-Level Mathematicscited by 192
  6. 2023LINC: A Neurosymbolic Approach for Logical Reasoning by Combining Language Models with First-Order Logic Proverscited by 168
  7. 2020A Dataset for Statutory Reasoning in Tax Law Entailment and Question Answeringcited by 62
  8. 2024Herald: A Natural Language Annotated Lean 4 Datasetcited by 59
  9. 2024A Survey on Deep Learning for Theorem Provingcited by 57
  10. 2025Aria: An Agent For Retrieval and Iterative Auto-Formalization via Dependency Graphcited by 21
  11. 2021Catala: A Programming Language for the Lawcited by 20
  12. 2024P-FOLIO: Evaluating and Improving Logical Reasoning with Abundant Human-Written Reasoning Chainscited by 15
4 more
  1. 2024Scheherazade: Evaluating Chain-of-Thought Math Reasoning in LLMs with Chain-of-Problemscited by 7
  2. 2025An LLM Agentic Approach for Legal-Critical Software: A Case Study for Tax Prep Softwarecited by 6
  3. 2026DeonticBench: A Benchmark for Reasoning over Rulescited by 5
  4. 2023'Put the Car on the Stand': SMT-based Oracles for Investigating Decisionscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.