mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning When to Commit from Partial Speech for End-to-End Simultaneous Speech Translation

arXiv 2610.02612 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Simultaneous speech translation must emit useful target text before the source is complete while preserving every committed token. We adapt a full-utterance speech language model using prefix supervision derived from its own complete- and partial-waveform translations, requiring neither transcripts nor human translations. We compare single-turn forced-prefix and multi-turn append-only decoding, use a confidence threshold to control the inference-time quality--latency trade-off, and vary the density of training prefixes with a separate synthesis margin. On FLEURS and CoVoST2 in three language directions, prefix training improves quality--latency frontiers over the unadapted model, and confidence provides the broadest consistently competitive operating range. Multi-turn decoding is generally stronger at low latency; under multi-turn training, commit-calibration error falls by 63--68% overall and 68--80% at early prefixes, whereas single-turn training provides only modest overall calibration gains and no early-prefix improvement. A small synthesis margin sometimes extends the frontier to lower latency, particularly on shorter utterances, while a larger margin degrades translation quality and calibration. Prefix adaptation therefore improves simultaneous speech translation, especially under multi-turn append-only decoding, while synthesis density introduces a non-monotonic quality--latency trade-off.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

5 of 6 references.

References · 5

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2016Can neural machine translation do simultaneous translation?cited by 86
  3. 2019Calibration of Encoder Decoder Models for Neural Machine Translationcited by 68
  4. 2020Low-Latency Sequence-to-Sequence Speech Recognition and Translation by Partial Hypothesis Selectioncited by 49
  5. 2018Low-Latency Neural Speech Translationcited by 37

Built on by

Not cited yet.