Why Does Adaptive Batching Help LLM Pretraining? A Perspective from Unbounded Variance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Increasing the batch size during training is a common practice in large language model (LLM) pretraining, yet the theoretical justification behind its success is not well understood. Analyses of stochastic optimization often assume uniformly bounded stochastic gradient variance, yet recent evidence suggests that this assumption fails in many practical nonconvex problems. The Blum--Gladyshev (BG-0) noise model relaxes this assumption by allowing the variance to grow quadratically with the distance from initialization, suggesting that batch size schedulers can help by controlling the variance growth during training. However, this growth can be overly conservative in practice. We empirically investigate variance growth in LLM pretraining and observe that a generalized BG model with a tunable growth exponent provides a tighter description of practical noise behavior. Motivated by this observation, we introduce the generalized BG-a noise model, which interpolates between bounded variance (a=0) and BG-0 noise (a=2). Under L-smoothness, we derive an information-theoretic lower bound with growth-dependent oracle complexity Omega(ε-(4+a)) and establish a matching upper bound in ε-dependence by increasing the batch size as the iterates move away from initialization. Finally, we propose an adaptive batch scheduler that controls variance growth through dynamic batch size adjustments during training. In pretraining OLMo2 models of up to 1B parameters on C4, our scheduler achieves a lower validation loss than both small and large batch training under matched token budgets, while using less than 10% of the iterations of small batch training.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.
Builds on
25 of 33 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,492
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 724
- 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 320
- 2019Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 307
- 2018An Empirical Model of Large-Batch Trainingcited by 281
- 2018Measuring the Effects of Data Parallelism on Neural Network Trainingcited by 193
- 2020Better Theory for SGD in the Nonconvex Worldcited by 158
13 more
- 2022On the SDEs and Scaling Rules for Adaptive Gradient Algorithmscited by 104
- 2024How Does Critical Batch Size Scale in Pre-training?cited by 73
- 2016Coupling Adaptive Batch Sizes with Learning Ratescited by 30
- 2017Adaptive Sampling Strategies for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 30
- 2025Critical Batch Size Revisited: A Simple Empirical Approach to Large-Batch Language Model Trainingcited by 23
- 2025Towards Weaker Variance Assumptions for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 17
- 2019On the Computation and Communication Complexity of Parallel SGD with Dynamic Batch Sizes for Stochastic Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 15
- 2023Beyond Implicit Bias: The Insignificance of SGD Noise in Online Learningcited by 10
- 2026Lost in Backpropagation: The LM Head is a Gradient Bottleneckcited by 9
- 2026Lower Bounds and Proximally Anchored SGD for Non-Convex Minimization Under Unbounded Variancecited by 5
- 2026Adaptive Batch Sizes Using Non-Euclidean Gradient Noise Scales for Stochastic Sign and Spectral Descentcited by 2
- 2026Beyond Bounded Variance: Variance-Reduced Normalized Methods for Nonconvex Optimization under Blum-Gladyshev Noisecited by 2
- 2026Revisiting the Adam-SGD Gap in LLM Pre-Training: The Role of Large Effective Learning Ratescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.