mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LawCompass: Navigating from Legal QA to Multi-Agent Deep Research with Grounded Evidence

arXiv 2610.01027 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Legal and financial RAG

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) have significantly democratized access to legal information. Nevertheless, most existing legal assistants remain confined to multi-turn conversational QA, failing to support complex legal tasks that require systematic evidence retrieval, multi-step reasoning, and report-level synthesis. In this paper, we present LawCompass, an evidence-grounded legal assistant that navigates the transition from standard Legal QA to multi-agent deep research. LawCompass provides three task-oriented functions: Legal QA, which delivers precise, evidence-backed answers to legal questions; Professional Retrieval, which enables structured exploration of statutes and judicial cases via query rewriting; and Deep Research, which employs a multi-agent workflow to decompose complex legal tasks and synthesize comprehensive research reports. Crucially, LawCompass maintains explicit citation links across all modules, empowering users to directly verify system outputs against original legal sources. Evaluation results demonstrate that LawCompass provides a practical and scalable paradigm for transforming conversational AI into trustworthy and evidence-grounded legal research assistance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Legal and financial RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 11 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

11 of 17 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025LawPal : A Retrieval Augmented Generation Based System for Enhanced Legal Accessibility in India23 Feb
  2. 2024GRAF: Graph Retrieval Augmented by Facts for Romanian Legal Multi-Choice Question Answering5 Dec

Other references · 9

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
  3. 2023Large Language Models in Finance: A Surveycited by 223
  4. 2023Large Language Models in Law: A Surveycited by 128
  5. 2023Chatlaw: A Multi-Agent Legal Assistant based on a Role-Aligned Mixture-of-Experts Architecturecited by 119
  6. 2025Multi-Agent Simulator Drives Language Models for Legal Intensive Interactioncited by 22
  7. 2025CoCoLex: Confidence-guided Copy-based Decoding for Grounded Legal Text Generationcited by 6
  8. 2024ELLA: Empowering LLMs for Interpretable, Accurate and Informative Legal Advicecited by 5
  9. 2025LegalCore: A Dataset for Event Coreference Resolution in Legal Documentscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026LawThinker: A Deep Research Legal Agent in Dynamic Environments
  2. 2025L-MARS: Legal Multi-Agent System with Agentic Search and Citation-Faithfulness Audit
  3. 2026Legal Research Bench: Measuring End-to-End Reliability in Long-Horizon Legal Research Agents
  4. 2026Investigating Multi-Agent Deliberation in Law
  5. 2025A Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmark
  6. 2026From Query to Counsel: Structured Reasoning with a Multi-Agent Framework and Dataset for Legal Consultation
  7. 2024LegalAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Legal Domain
  8. 2025Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation Agent for Trustworthy Legal Question Answering in Judicial Forensics