mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enterprise Representation Simplification (ERS): Reducing Representational Complexity for Enterprise AI

arXiv 2610.00791 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2026cs.AI cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Enterprise information is represented through artifacts shaped by applications, projects, technologies, organizational boundaries, and local requirements. These structures accumulate over time, creating representational complexity that must be maintained by the enterprise and interpreted by information consumers and AI systems. This paper introduces Enterprise Representation Simplification (ERS) as reducing unnecessary representational complexity while preserving required information within a defined scope, and Enterprise Representation Complexity (ERC), a representation-neutral model for comparing complexity across representation states. ERC characterizes representational extent through four dimensions: Representation Objects, Interactions, Behaviors, and Supporting Sources. Objects, Interactions, and Behaviors form dependent categories, while Supporting Sources characterize representation exposure. ERC is defined at representation and task levels, enabling comparison and distinguishing architectural simplification from retrieval optimization. The paper develops two consequences of ERS. First, representational structures create lifecycle obligations for maintenance, governance, dependencies, change, enhancement, and operation. An economic model distinguishes recurring global representation cost, recurring task-level cost, and one-time transformation cost, enabling evaluation over a defined time horizon. Second, reductions in task-level ERC reduce the representational extent an AI system must identify, relate, and interpret. Text-to-SQL research provides evidence that reduced schema and reasoning complexity can improve reasoning accuracy. ERC is not a universal complexity, performance, or cost metric. It provides measurable architectural variables for comparing representational alternatives, transformation effects, economic outcomes, and AI reasoning performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

Builds on

15 of 40 references.

References · 15

  1. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  2. 2020A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applicationscited by 643
  3. 2020Knowledge Graphscited by 619
  4. 2019Towards Complex Text-to-SQL in Cross-Domain Database with Intermediate Representationcited by 210
  5. 2024AI Agents That Mattercited by 199
  6. 2025Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluationcited by 83
  7. 2024BEAVER: An Enterprise Benchmark for Text-to-SQLcited by 37
  8. 2025AutoLink: Autonomous Schema Exploration and Expansion for Scalable Schema Linking in Text-to-SQL at Scalecited by 15
  9. 2025Energy Use of AI Inference, Efficiency Pathways, and Test-Time Scalingcited by 12
  10. 2025Promoting Sustainable Web Agents: Benchmarking and Estimating Energy Consumption through Empirical and Theoretical Analysiscited by 3
  11. 2026Semantic Layers for Reliable LLM-Powered Data Analytics: A Paired Benchmark of Accuracy and Hallucination Across Three Frontier Modelscited by 3
  12. 2026The Case for Text-to-SQL Friendly Logical Database Designcited by 2
3 more
  1. 2026A Semantic-Layer-Mediated Agent for Natural Language to SQL over Heterogeneous Enterprise Databasescited by 2
  2. 2025Conceptual Modeling: Topics, Themes, and Technology Trendscited by 1
  3. 2026Can your AI agent be cheaper? Investigating the effects of task specifications on token spend in agentic coding taskscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.