From Image Latent Space to Fuzzy Rules: Interpretable Analysis of Gastrointestinal Foundation Model
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundation models pretrained on large-scale datasets demonstrate strong transferability to medical imaging tasks. However, understanding how their latent representations encode clinically relevant information remains an open challenge in safety-critical domains. This study proposes a prototype-based fuzzy-rule framework that interprets the patch-level features produced by the inner layers of pretrained foundation models, without any fine-tuning. Class-specific prototypes are learned by clustering in the feature space, yielding compact visual patterns. Patch features are then expressed as prototype similarities and classified by fuzzy rules with linguistic IF-THEN conditions that are human readable. The framework is applied across the final two blocks of ViT-S/16 backbones pretrained on ImageNet-1K and GastroNet-5M, and benchmarked against k-nearest neighbours, kernel SVM, and linear probing under identical frozen features, on wireless capsule endoscopy classification, gastrointestinal endoscopy classification, and colonic polyp segmentation. The experimental analysis shows that the proposed method, without backbone fine-tuning, reaches accuracy comparable to these black-box classifiers, and that domain-specific pretraining yields features that are both discriminative and symbolically compressible. Because the resulting rules are extracted from real data and expressed in interpretable terms, they are further used as an instrument to investigate synthetic medical images, providing a human-readable account of which real prototypes and rules a generator reproduces or fails to reproduce, localising where a synthetic image departs from real tissue rather than summarising it with a single score. The framework thus offers a transparent, depth-resolved view of how foundation models organise clinically relevant structure, together with a practical downstream use of the extracted rules.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 27 references.
References · 13
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
- 2019Kvasir-SEG: A Segmented Polyp Datasetcited by 589
- 2020Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-grained Image Recognitioncited by 214
- 2018Not-so-supervised: a survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysiscited by 179
- 2019Towards Explainable Deep Neural Networks (xDNN)cited by 61
- 2023This Intestine Does Not Exist: Multiscale Residual Variational Autoencoder for Realistic Wireless Capsule Endoscopy Image Generationcited by 9
- 2024Clinical Evaluation of Medical Image Synthesis: A Case Study in Wireless Capsule Endoscopycited by 4
1 more
- 2025Interpretable Similarity of Synthetic Image Utilitycited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.