Bounded-Fidelity Sim-as-Demo-Stage: Mocap Handoff for Governance Benchmarks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sim-to-real research pursues physics fidelity as a primary objective: simulators are judged by how closely they reproduce real-world contact dynamics. For governance benchmarking of LLM-driven robots, where the simulator demonstrates that an admission/policy/contract/audit pipeline behaves correctly, contact fidelity at object handoffs (grasp, carry, place) becomes a liability: contact-force integration noise injects audit-chain divergence that is structurally unrelated to the governance property under test. We propose bounded-fidelity sim-as-demo-stage, a design pattern that suppresses contact physics within explicitly bracketed handoff envelopes while preserving full dynamics elsewhere. The construction uses MuJoCo's mocap-body primitive driven by a 220-line Python adapter that the governance bridge invokes via structured intents. We formalise audit-chain stability as byte-equality of the hashed event log across replays and identify two structural envelope properties that imply it. Across N=1000 replays per posture, the mocap variant produces one distinct audit-chain hash (1000/1000 byte-identical; Wilson 95% CI [0.997, 1.000]); the contact-force baseline produces 584 distinct hashes (993/1000 diverged; CI [0.987, 0.998]). A timestep sweep (1, 2, 5, 10 ms) shows the divergence is structural, not a tuning artefact: it stays at 0.985 at every timestep. Envelope-edge timing jitter (+/-10 simulation steps, 1,400 replays) produces 0 divergence, and audit chains remain byte-equal across K in {1, 2, 3} sequentially handed-off objects (1,500 replays) with sub-linear per-pick-and-place overhead. The pattern gives benchmark designers audit-chain reproducibility at near-zero engineering cost; we also map where it is harmful (sim-to-real validation, policy training, contact-rich tasks) so it is not mis-deployed.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2026.
Builds on
18 of 31 references.
References · 18
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
- 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,401
- 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,172
- 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,057
- 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 850
- 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matterscited by 727
- 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 699
- 2019RLBench: The Robot Learning Benchmark & Learning Environmentcited by 669
- 2018Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulationcited by 643
- 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 616
- 2023Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandboxcited by 514
6 more
- 2021Habitat 2.0: Training Home Assistants to Rearrange their Habitatcited by 501
- 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 484
- 2020Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Surveycited by 388
- 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
- 2018Sim-to-Real: Learning Agile Locomotion For Quadruped Robotscited by 277
- 2014Reducing the Barrier to Entry of Complex Robotic Software: a MoveIt! Case Studycited by 86
Built on by
Not cited yet.