mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SEPAL: Separated Expert Pairs with Answer-Level Fusion for Reliable LLM Collaboration

arXiv 2609.39645 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent collaboration lets large language models (LLMs) improve question answering through deliberation and feedback. Yet shared discussion couples correction with exposure to the same mistakes, which can erode the diversity needed for voting. Self-consistency offers sampling diversity without feedback, while single-pair Actor-Critic collaboration refines only one candidate. We introduce SEPAL, which assigns three private Actor-Critic teams to direct reasoning, evidence grounding, and verification. Role-specific training gives the teams different reasoning objectives beyond sampling variation. Each Critic guides revisions within its own team, preventing feedback from carrying errors across candidates. Once revision ends, majority voting combines only the final answers, keeping the reasoning histories separate until the decision. Across five open-weight backbones and five question-answering benchmarks, SEPAL improves mean accuracy by 1.81 percentage points over a matched single Actor-Critic pair, with improvements across all five backbones. Code is available at https://github.com/zhansan114514/SEPAL.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

Builds on

28 of 30 references.

References · 28

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  6. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  7. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  8. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  9. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  10. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
  11. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  12. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
16 more
  1. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  2. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  3. 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
  4. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
  5. 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 895
  6. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 751
  7. 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 742
  8. 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 724
  9. 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 550
  10. 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 491
  11. 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 420
  12. 2023ReConcile: Round-Table Conference Improves Reasoning via Consensus among Diverse LLMscited by 297
  13. 2024More Agents Is All You Needcited by 174
  14. 2025Multiagent Finetuning: Self Improvement with Diverse Reasoning Chainscited by 90
  15. 2024CoMM: Collaborative Multi-Agent, Multi-Reasoning-Path Prompting for Complex Problem Solvingcited by 31
  16. 2024ACC-Collab: An Actor-Critic Approach to Multi-Agent LLM Collaborationcited by 22

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Debate Only When Necessary: Adaptive Multiagent Collaboration for Efficient LLM Reasoning
  2. 2023Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models via Multi-Agent Peer Review Collaboration
  3. 2025MARS: toward more efficient multi-agent collaboration for LLM reasoning
  4. 2025Collective Reasoning Among LLMs: A Framework for Answer Validation Without Ground Truth
  5. 2025Self-Improvement of Language Models by Post-Training on Multi-Agent Debate
  6. 2025Talk Structurally, Act Hierarchically: A Collaborative Framework for LLM Multi-Agent Systems
  7. 2025Can LLM Agents Really Debate? A Controlled Study of Multi-Agent Debate in Logical Reasoning
  8. 2023Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMs