RW-Flow: One-Step Generation on Compact Manifolds via Wasserstein Gradient Flows
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Manifold-valued data, and consequently the distributions they induce, are prevalent across many domains, ranging from the locations of geospatial events, such as earthquakes, to biomolecular torsion angles that encode information about three-dimensional structure. While diffusion and flow-based generative models have been successfully extended to compact manifolds, sampling typically requires tens or hundreds of sequential network evaluations. We introduce RW-Flow, a theoretically grounded framework for learning one-step generative models on compact manifolds via Wasserstein gradient flows. The main challenge is identifiability: driving the velocity field to zero should guarantee that the model distribution matches the target distribution. We establish a necessary and sufficient condition for identifiability on compact, connected Riemannian manifolds. We specifically show that, for a symmetric, Lipschitz-continuous cost function, the velocity field induced by the Sinkhorn divergence is identifiable if and only if the associated Gibbs kernel is nondegenerate. This characterization provides a general principle for designing identifiable costs on compact manifolds. It also reveals that the squared geodesic distance, the natural manifold analogue of the squared Euclidean distance, does not always guarantee identifiability. Across benchmarks involving geospatial events, protein side chain torsion angles, RNA backbone torsion angles, and general manifolds discretized as triangular meshes, RW-Flow outperforms existing one-step methods in nearly all settings under fair comparison conditions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.
Builds on
28 of 52 references.
References · 28
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2023Consistency Modelscited by 1,778
- 2023One-step Diffusion with Distribution Matching Distillationcited by 978
- 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 524
- 2023Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Modelscited by 430
- 2017Learning Generative Models with Sinkhorn Divergencescited by 310
- 2023Flow Matching on General Geometriescited by 260
- 2022Riemannian Score-Based Generative Modellingcited by 216
- 2024Score identity Distillation: Exponentially Fast Distillation of Pretrained Diffusion Models for One-Step Generationcited by 211
- 2015On Wasserstein Two Sample Testing and Related Families of Nonparametric Testscited by 165
- 2020Riemannian Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 143
- 2018Improving GANs Using Optimal Transportcited by 122
16 more
- 2022Riemannian Diffusion Modelscited by 120
- 2020Normalizing Flows on Tori and Spherescited by 117
- 2026Generative Modeling via Driftingcited by 98
- 2025How to build a consistency model: Learning flow maps via self-distillationcited by 96
- 2020Mat'ern Gaussian processes on Riemannian manifoldscited by 82
- 2020Latent Variable Modelling with Hyperbolic Normalizing Flowscited by 49
- 2014Geodesic Exponential Kernels: When Curvature and Linearity Conflictcited by 47
- 2022Stationary Kernels and Gaussian Processes on Lie Groups and their Homogeneous Spaces I: the compact casecited by 25
- 2026One-Step Generative Modeling via Wasserstein Gradient Flowscited by 18
- 2025Generalised Flow Maps for Few-Step Generative Modelling on Riemannian Manifoldscited by 10
- 2023Invariant kernels on Riemannian symmetric spaces: a harmonic-analytic approachcited by 6
- 2025Riemannian Consistency Modelcited by 6
- 2026Kernel-Gradient Drifting Modelscited by 6
- 2023The Gaussian kernel on the circle and spaces that admit isometric embeddings of the circlecited by 5
- 2026Riemannian MeanFlowcited by 5
- 2023Gaussian kernels on non-simply-connected closed Riemannian manifolds are never positive definitecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.