Certified Approximation for Interpretable Representer Landmarks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Representer explanations rank the training landmarks that most influence a self-supervised representation. At scale, this ranking rests on up to four stacked approximations of the empirical neural tangent kernel (eNTK). These are random output heads, a parameter sketch, landmark sampling and a coefficient fit. Existing analyses bound each approximation separately, but none certifies the top-K set against their combined error. We introduce CAIRN (Certified Approximation for Interpretable Representer laNdmarks), a framework that carries this error through to the ranking. We derive the exact variance of the sketched multi-head eNTK, which matches measurement within 4% where Johnson-Lindenstrauss bounds err by up to 2.5×. This yields a high-probability top-K certificate for a fixed coefficient fit, alongside exact residual-trace certificates for discarded spectral mass. An exact product-variance identity separates kernel error from fit variability and identifies when a larger kernel budget can still sharpen a ranking. Stochastic Lanczos Quadrature (SLQ) estimates the effective dimension within 0.72% and guides the landmark budget without dense eigendecomposition. We show that residual mass does not control class coverage, and residual-greedy selection cuts the worst coverage excess of k-means++ from 8.5× to 1.55× (4× on the sketched eNTK). Cross-view initializers outperform principal-component initialization in five (AUI) to all six (CSI) settings. Against the KREPES Gauss-Newton solver, CAIRN converges 2.5 to 11.3× faster, trails by at most 0.31 points and gains up to 3.14 points on MNIST. Together, these results make the reliability of representer explanations measurable and show where approximation budgets are best spent.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.
Builds on
29 of 57 references.
References · 29
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
- 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378
- 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 313
- 2014Sketching as a Tool for Numerical Linear Algebracited by 288
- 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
- 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 252
17 more
- 2019Limitations of the Empirical Fisher Approximation for Natural Gradient Descentcited by 217
- 2018Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networkscited by 187
- 2015Less is More: Nystr"om Computational Regularizationcited by 91
- 2013Revisiting the Nystrom Method for Improved Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 77
- 2015Newton Sketch: A Linear-time Optimization Algorithm with Linear-Quadratic Convergencecited by 72
- 2018On Fast Leverage Score Sampling and Optimal Learningcited by 41
- 2021Sketching Curvature for Efficient Out-of-Distribution Detection for Deep Neural Networkscited by 32
- 2022A Fast, Well-Founded Approximation to the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 30
- 2021ViViT: Curvature access through the generalized Gauss-Newton's low-rank structurecited by 16
- 2023A Bayesian Approach To Analysing Training Data Attribution In Deep Learningcited by 11
- 2024Efficient Sketches for Training Data Attribution and Studying the Loss Landscapecited by 10
- 2018Distributed Adaptive Sampling for Kernel Matrix Approximationcited by 9
- 2022Block subsampled randomized Hadamard transform for low-rank approximation on distributed architecturescited by 4
- 2026Imperfect Influence, Preserved Rankings: A Theory of TRAK for Data Attributioncited by 2
- 2015oASIS: Adaptive Column Sampling for Kernel Matrix Approximationcited by 1
- 2025Interpretable Self-Supervised Learning via Representer Landmarks and Nystr"om Approximationcited by 1
- 2026A Unified Theory of Random Projection for Influence Functionscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.