A Bayesian Approach To Analysing Training Data Attribution In Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training data attribution (TDA) techniques find influential training data for the model's prediction on the test data of interest. They approximate the impact of down- or up-weighting a particular training sample. While conceptually useful, they are hardly applicable to deep models in practice, particularly because of their sensitivity to different model initialisation. In this paper, we introduce a Bayesian perspective on the TDA task, where the learned model is treated as a Bayesian posterior and the TDA estimates as random variables. From this novel viewpoint, we observe that the influence of an individual training sample is often overshadowed by the noise stemming from model initialisation and SGD batch composition. Based on this observation, we argue that TDA can only be reliably used for explaining deep model predictions that are consistently influenced by certain training data, independent of other noise factors. Our experiments demonstrate the rarity of such noise-independent training-test data pairs but confirm their existence. We recommend that future researchers and practitioners trust TDA estimates only in such cases. Further, we find a disagreement between ground truth and estimated TDA distributions and encourage future work to study this gap. Code is provided at https://github.com/ElisaNguyen/bayesian-tda.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2023.
Builds on
24 of 34 references.
References · 24
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
- 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
- 2020Visual Transformers: Token-based Image Representation and Processing for Computer Visioncited by 333
- 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 273
- 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
12 more
- 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 186
- 2022If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?cited by 142
- 2022Training Data Influence Analysis and Estimation: A Surveycited by 134
- 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 130
- 2020FastIF: Scalable Influence Functions for Efficient Model Interpretation and Debuggingcited by 120
- 2018Understanding the Origins of Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 90
- 2021Input Similarity from the Neural Network Perspectivecited by 78
- 2018Interpreting Black Box Predictions using Fisher Kernelscited by 48
- 2021Revisiting Methods for Finding Influential Examplescited by 39
- 2021Rethinking Influence Functions of Neural Networks in the Over-parameterized Regimecited by 26
- 2023Revisiting the Fragility of Influence Functionscited by 20
- 2023How Many and Which Training Points Would Need to be Removed to Flip this Prediction?cited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2024Data Shapley in One Training Runcited by 76
- 2024Training Data Attribution via Approximate Unrolled Differentiationcited by 33
- 2025Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Productscited by 10
- 2025Large Language Model Sourcing: A Surveycited by 5
- 2024Final-Model-Only Data Attribution with a Unifying View of Gradient-Based Methodscited by 4
- 2024Adversarial Attacks on Data Attributioncited by 2
- 2025Enhancing Interpretability in Generative AI Through Search-Based Data Influence Analysiscited by 1
- 2026A Bayesian Information-Theoretic Approach to Data Attributioncited by 1
- 2025TuCo: Measuring the Contribution of Fine-Tuning to Individual Responses of LLMscited by 0
- 2026On the Fragility of Data Attribution When Learning Is Distributedcited by 0
- 2026Certified Approximation for Interpretable Representer Landmarkscited by 0
- 2026Certified Approximation for Interpretable Representer Landmarks30 Sep 2026
- 2026On the Fragility of Data Attribution When Learning Is Distributed15 May 2026
- 2026A Bayesian Information-Theoretic Approach to Data Attribution4 Apr 2026
- 2025Large Language Model Sourcing: A Survey11 Oct 2025
- 2025Better Training Data Attribution via Better Inverse Hessian-Vector Products19 Jul 2025
- 2025TuCo: Measuring the Contribution of Fine-Tuning to Individual Responses of LLMs29 Jun 2025
- 2025Enhancing Interpretability in Generative AI Through Search-Based Data Influence Analysis2 Apr 2025
- 2024Final-Model-Only Data Attribution with a Unifying View of Gradient-Based Methods5 Dec 2024
- 2024Adversarial Attacks on Data Attribution9 Sep 2024
- 2024Data Shapley in One Training Run16 Jun 2024
- 2024Training Data Attribution via Approximate Unrolled Differentiation20 May 2024