mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Bayesian Approach To Analysing Training Data Attribution In Deep Learning

arXiv 2305.19765 ↗First posted 31 May 2023cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training data attribution (TDA) techniques find influential training data for the model's prediction on the test data of interest. They approximate the impact of down- or up-weighting a particular training sample. While conceptually useful, they are hardly applicable to deep models in practice, particularly because of their sensitivity to different model initialisation. In this paper, we introduce a Bayesian perspective on the TDA task, where the learned model is treated as a Bayesian posterior and the TDA estimates as random variables. From this novel viewpoint, we observe that the influence of an individual training sample is often overshadowed by the noise stemming from model initialisation and SGD batch composition. Based on this observation, we argue that TDA can only be reliably used for explaining deep model predictions that are consistently influenced by certain training data, independent of other noise factors. Our experiments demonstrate the rarity of such noise-independent training-test data pairs but confirm their existence. We recommend that future researchers and practitioners trust TDA estimates only in such cases. Further, we find a disagreement between ground truth and estimated TDA distributions and encourage future work to study this gap. Code is provided at https://github.com/ElisaNguyen/bayesian-tda.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2023.

Builds on

24 of 34 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  4. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  5. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  6. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
  7. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  8. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
  9. 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
  10. 2020Visual Transformers: Token-based Image Representation and Processing for Computer Visioncited by 333
  11. 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 273
  12. 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
12 more
  1. 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 186
  2. 2022If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?cited by 142
  3. 2022Training Data Influence Analysis and Estimation: A Surveycited by 134
  4. 2021Scaling Up Influence Functionscited by 130
  5. 2020FastIF: Scalable Influence Functions for Efficient Model Interpretation and Debuggingcited by 120
  6. 2018Understanding the Origins of Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 90
  7. 2021Input Similarity from the Neural Network Perspectivecited by 78
  8. 2018Interpreting Black Box Predictions using Fisher Kernelscited by 48
  9. 2021Revisiting Methods for Finding Influential Examplescited by 39
  10. 2021Rethinking Influence Functions of Neural Networks in the Over-parameterized Regimecited by 26
  11. 2023Revisiting the Fragility of Influence Functionscited by 20
  12. 2023How Many and Which Training Points Would Need to be Removed to Flip this Prediction?cited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

11 papers.