Function-Space Transformer with Adaptive Anchors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many forms of data, including physical fields, geometric shapes, and visual signals, are naturally described by functions over continuous domains but are observed through discrete samples. Representing these functions on fixed uniform grids imposes a trade-off between resolving localized variation and increasing computation across the domain. Neural operators address this mismatch by learning mappings between functions, while latent-attention architectures provide flexible processing of sampled observations. We introduce the Function-Space Transformer (FST), a framework for learning from functions through a spatially adaptive continuous latent representation. FST stores features at anchors whose locations are predicted from the input observations and recursively refines these anchor features through function-space interactions. This allows the representation to adapt its spatial organization to each input rather than inherit that of the observation grid, while supporting both spatially resolved and finite-dimensional outputs. On PDE solution prediction using PDEBench Burgers and Darcy flow, FST substantially outperforms the Perceiver IO baseline, whose latent representation lacks explicit spatial organization, and is highly competitive with the Fourier Neural Operator. On ImageNet-1K, FST achieves higher classification accuracy than the Vision Transformer baseline, with fewer parameters across these comparisons. Ablations further support the benefits of function-space updates and recursive refinement. Together, these results highlight the potential of adaptive continuous representations for both scientific prediction and visual recognition.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
23 of 28 references.
References · 23
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
- 2021Perceiver: General Perception with Iterative Attentioncited by 1,089
- 2020Convolutional Occupancy Networkscited by 760
- 2021Perceiver IO: A General Architecture for Structured Inputs & Outputscited by 616
- 2018Universal Transformerscited by 613
- 2020Learning Continuous Image Representation with Local Implicit Image Functioncited by 550
- 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 417
- 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 396
- 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 299
11 more
- 2022Vision Transformer with Deformable Attentioncited by 293
- 2023Geometry-Informed Neural Operator for Large-Scale 3D PDEscited by 293
- 2025Hierarchical Reasoning Modelcited by 167
- 2025AB-UPT: Scaling Neural CFD Surrogates for High-Fidelity Automotive Aerodynamics Simulations via Anchored-Branched Universal Physics Transformerscited by 49
- 2024CViT: Continuous Vision Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 47
- 2024Continuum Attention for Neural Operatorscited by 39
- 2024AROMA: Preserving Spatial Structure for Latent PDE Modeling with Local Neural Fieldscited by 38
- 2024Grounding Continuous Representations in Geometry: Equivariant Neural Fieldscited by 19
- 2024Space-Time Continuous PDE Forecasting using Equivariant Neural Fieldscited by 18
- 2023Inducing Point Operator Transformer: A Flexible and Scalable Architecture for Solving PDEscited by 16
- 2026From Basis to Basis: Gaussian Particle Representation for Interpretable PDE Operatorscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.