Procedural Core: A Compact Recurrent Initialization for Vision Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformers are typically trained from random initialization, requiring all their capabilities to emerge from large-scale optimization. Recent work showed that a small amount of abstract procedurally generated data can help acquire generic inductive structure at low cost. However, this adds a pretraining stage that must be repeated for every target model. We propose Procedural Core, an initialization strategy that captures this generic structure into a compact set of weights that can be reused across models. We train a minimal recurrent transformer on procedural data, then expand its weights to initialize transformers of arbitrary width and depth. The resulting initialization improves performance on image classification, self-supervised visual learning (DINO), and modeling natural language (FineWeb-Edu) and code (CodeParrot). For image classification, expanding a 1M-parameter core to initialize an 85M-parameter ViT-Base improves ImageNet top-1 accuracy by 2.2 pp over standard random initialization. Our analysis identifies recurrence as essential for learning compact weights that transfer across models. In ViTs, we localize a key benefit in the suppression of high-norm tokens that produces substantial improvements in zero-shot segmentation (ImageNet-S mAP 32.3 to 42.9), object localization (VOC07 CorLoc 9.9 to 18.4), and depth estimation (NYUv2 RMSE 1.104 to 0.998). This demonstrates that transformers need not start from a blank slate, and can be initialized with generic capabilities at low cost with no domain- or task-specific data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
47 of 59 references.
References · 47
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,069
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 871
- 2018Universal Transformerscited by 647
- 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 419
- 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 311
- 2025Reasoning with Latent Thoughts: On the Power of Looped Transformerscited by 240
35 more
- 2023Looped Transformers as Programmable Computerscited by 237
- 2021Localizing Objects with Self-Supervised Transformers and no Labelscited by 230
- 2025Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Modelscited by 165
- 2021Large-scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 101
- 2021Learning to See by Looking at Noisecited by 92
- 2021bert2BERT: Towards Reusable Pretrained Language Modelscited by 70
- 2023Mimetic Initialization of Self-Attention Layerscited by 54
- 2025Teaching Pretrained Language Models to Think Deeper with Retrofitted Recurrencecited by 47
- 2023Modeling rapid language learning by distilling Bayesian priors into artificial neural networkscited by 42
- 2025Vision Transformers Don't Need Trained Registerscited by 41
- 2023Initializing Models with Larger Onescited by 39
- 2025Between Circuits and Chomsky: Pre-pretraining on Formal Languages Imparts Linguistic Biasescited by 37
- 2023Injecting structural hints: Using language models to study inductive biases in language learningcited by 35
- 2024Scaling Smart: Accelerating Large Language Model Pre-training with Small Model Initializationcited by 29
- 2021ZerO Initialization: Initializing Neural Networks with only Zeros and Onescited by 28
- 2022Insights into Pre-training via Simpler Synthetic Taskscited by 26
- 2021On the Transferability of Pre-trained Language Models: A Study from Artificial Datasetscited by 25
- 2025Learning to See Before Seeing: Demystifying LLM Visual Priors from Language Pre-trainingcited by 23
- 2025Block-Recurrent Dynamics in Vision Transformerscited by 20
- 2024On the Inductive Bias of Stacking Towards Improving Reasoningcited by 19
- 2024WAVE: Weight Templates for Adaptive Initialization of Variable-sized Modelscited by 17
- 2025Large Language Model for Lossless Image Compression with Visual Promptscited by 16
- 2024Scaling Backwards: Minimal Synthetic Pre-training?cited by 14
- 2024LM4LV: A Frozen Large Language Model for Low-level Vision Taskscited by 13
- 2024Intelligence at the Edge of Chaoscited by 13
- 2023Pre-training Vision Transformers with Very Limited Synthesized Imagescited by 12
- 2024Efficient Stagewise Pretraining via Progressive Subnetworkscited by 10
- 2026Procedural Pretraining: Warming Up Language Models with Abstract Datacited by 10
- 2025Transformers Pretrained on Procedural Data Contain Modular Structures for Algorithmic Reasoningcited by 9
- 2025Can You Learn to See Without Images? Procedural Warm-Up for Vision Transformerscited by 8
- 2023SIP: Injecting a Structural Inductive Bias into a Seq2Seq Model by Simulationcited by 7
- 2025Structured Initialization for Vision Transformerscited by 6
- 2026Seeing to Generalize: How Visual Data Corrects Binding Shortcutscited by 4
- 2025Random Initialization Can't Catch Up: The Advantage of Language Model Transfer for Time Series Forecastingcited by 2
- 2025IBiT: Utilizing Inductive Biases to Create a More Data Efficient Attention Mechanismcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.