mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Benchmarking graph-based models for in-silico toxicity prediction in drug discovery

arXiv 2609.37555 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.LG q-bio.BM q-bio.QMcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Drug discovery is a costly and high-risk process, where toxicity-related failures remain a major cause of attrition in both preclinical and clinical stages. As a result, accurate early prediction of chemical toxicity is essential to reduce downstream costs and improve compound prioritization. In this context, graph deep learning (GDL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for toxicity prediction, leveraging molecular graph representations to learn directly from chemical structure with improved expressivity over traditional approaches. Despite the growing number of proposed models, current literature-based comparisons are often difficult to interpret due to inconsistencies in datasets, preprocessing pipelines, and evaluation protocols. To address this limitation, we introduce a unified and standardized benchmarking framework for GDL-based toxicity prediction. We systematically evaluate more than 20 representative approaches under consistent experimental conditions and across multiple datasets and partitioning strategies, enabling a fair and reproducible comparison of model performance. In addition, we complement this empirical study with a structured literature analysis to contextualize existing methodological trends and performance claims. Our results provide a clearer and more reliable assessment of the current state of the field, highlighting both the strengths and limitations of existing graph-based approaches. To support transparency and reproducibility, we release our benchmarking framework as open-source software https://gitlab.citius.gal/noel.suarez/benchtox, allowing the community to evaluate and compare models under consistent conditions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

19 of 89 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  4. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  5. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,616
  6. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  7. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  8. 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
  9. 2017MoleculeNet: A Benchmark for Molecular Machine Learningcited by 1,037
  10. 2020Heterogeneous Graph Transformercited by 581
  11. 2021Pre-training Molecular Graph Representation with 3D Geometrycited by 248
  12. 2021ChemRL-GEM: Geometry Enhanced Molecular Representation Learning for Property Predictioncited by 204
7 more
  1. 2020Rethinking pooling in graph neural networkscited by 73
  2. 2022KPGT: Knowledge-Guided Pre-training of Graph Transformer for Molecular Property Predictioncited by 31
  3. 2024Scaffold Splits Overestimate Virtual Screening Performancecited by 7
  4. 2024ApisTox: a new benchmark dataset for the classification of small molecules toxicity on honey beescited by 6
  5. 2020Graph Pooling with Node Proximity for Hierarchical Representation Learningcited by 3
  6. 2023Geometry-aware Line Graph Transformer Pre-training for Molecular Property Predictioncited by 3
  7. 2024Dumpling GNN: Hybrid GNN Enables Better ADC Payload Activity Prediction Based on Chemical Structurecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.