Loss-Guided Pretraining Data Selection for Time-Series Foundation Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Time series foundation models (TSFMs) are pretrained on heterogeneous collections containing billions of observations, yet their training windows are typically sampled without estimating whether they provide useful learning signal. We introduce a static data-selection framework that scores each window with a reference forecaster and retains an intermediate interval within every source dataset. Specifically, we connect forecasting loss to optimization difficulty by showing that normalized squared loss controls the per-sample gradient norm under a local Jacobian condition. We then define a reference loss score and apply dataset-stratified selection to preserve the diversity of samples. Across various TSFM architectures, our method outperforms random selection by an absolute margin and even improves both relative MASE and CRPS over full-data pretraining by retaining fewer candidate pretraining windows. Further analyses show strong cross-scale and cross-architecture score correlations, indicating that a small reference model can often select data for larger targets, provided that the reference and target share compatible difficulty orderings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
22 of 27 references.
References · 22
- 2021Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with Auto-Correlation for Long-Term Series Forecastingcited by 1,676
- 2024Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Seriescited by 759
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
- 2023A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecastingcited by 692
- 2024Unified Training of Universal Time Series Forecasting Transformerscited by 614
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
- 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 399
- 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 328
- 2023SemDeDup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplicationcited by 303
- 2024Time-MoE: Billion-Scale Time Series Foundation Models with Mixture of Expertscited by 287
10 more
- 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 236
- 2024GIFT-Eval: A Benchmark For General Time Series Forecasting Model Evaluationcited by 212
- 2024Data Mixing Laws: Optimizing Data Mixtures by Predicting Language Modeling Performancecited by 184
- 2025Sundial: A Family of Highly Capable Time Series Foundation Modelscited by 180
- 2023DoGE: Domain Reweighting with Generalization Estimationcited by 90
- 2024Timer-XL: Long-Context Transformers for Unified Time Series Forecastingcited by 87
- 2023Efficient Online Data Mixing For Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 77
- 2024Adaptive Data Optimization: Dynamic Sample Selection with Scaling Lawscited by 47
- 2024TimeInf: Time Series Data Contribution via Influence Functionscited by 6
- 2025Rating Quality of Diverse Time Series Data by Meta-learning from LLM Judgmentcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.