mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Markovian Nonconvex ADMM for Reinforcement Learning: Bellman-Resolvent Stability Beyond Smooth Blocks

arXiv 2609.36859 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity

Abstract (arXiv)

We identify and study a structural mechanism for Markovian nonconvex ADMM in reinforcement learning. Using finite discounted MDPs as a canonical proving ground, we show that the discounted Bellman resolvent (I-γ Pπ)-1 can provide the multiplier stability that classical nonconvex ADMM analyses often obtain from a designated smooth block. Starting from this mechanism, we establish convergence under controlled Markov sampling and then under stochastic observations using an empirical Bellman surrogate that jointly represents the random residual and its Jacobian. Markov mixing, initialization drift, observation noise, and decaying bias enter as one operator perturbation, avoiding unbiased product and double sampling requirements. When the perturbations are square summable, the true KKT residual converges almost surely to zero. Under a finite conditional fourth moment condition, a companion iterate satisfies mathbbE[widetilde GK+1] ≤ A/T+(B/T)sumk<Tmk-1, which becomes O(T-1+T/N) for total Markov sample budget N, giving O(ε-1) iteration complexity and O(ε-2) sample complexity for squared KKT accuracy ε. Beyond stationarity, discounted occupancy coverage yields J^star-J(π)=O(√ G) for direct tabular policies, so covered exact KKT points are globally optimal, while a statewise quadratic Bellman-improvement condition sharpens the relation to O(G). Finally, nonlinear policy, projected Bellman, and explicit occupancy formulations exhibit the same chain of operator invertibility, dual representation, and multiplier stability. This supports discounted operator invertibility as a reusable structural principle for primal-dual reinforcement learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 0 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

0 of 36 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Stability and Generalization for Bellman Residuals
  2. 2025Finite-Sample Analysis of Policy Evaluation for Robust Average Reward Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2025Theoretical Barriers in Bellman-Based Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026Cochain Perspectives on Temporal-Difference Signals for Learning Beyond Markov Dynamics
  5. 2026Natural Policy Gradient as Doubly Smoothed Policy Iteration: A Bellman-Operator Framework
  6. 2026Mathematical methods of reinforcement learning
  7. 2026Bellman Residual Minimization for Control: Geometry, Stationarity, and Convergence
  8. 2025Bellman operator convergence enhancements in reinforcement learning algorithms