mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bellman Residual Minimization for Control: Geometry, Stationarity, and Convergence

arXiv 2601.18840 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2026cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Markov decision problems are most commonly solved via dynamic programming. Another approach is Bellman residual minimization, which directly minimizes the squared Bellman residual objective function. However, compared to dynamic programming, this approach has received relatively less attention, mainly because it is often less efficient in practice and can be more difficult to extend to model-free settings such as reinforcement learning. Nonetheless, Bellman residual minimization has several advantages that make it worth investigating, such as more stable convergence with function approximation for value functions. While Bellman residual methods for policy evaluation have been widely studied, methods for policy optimization (control tasks) have been scarcely explored. In this paper, we establish foundational results for the control Bellman residual minimization for policy optimization.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.

Builds on

7 of 34 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  3. 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 659
  4. 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 526
  5. 2015Taming the Noise in Reinforcement Learning via Soft Updatescited by 125
  6. 2022Why Should I Trust You, Bellman? The Bellman Error is a Poor Replacement for Value Errorcited by 31
  7. 2022Regularized Q-learningcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.