mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning via Self-Consistency for Diffusion-based Video Reasoning

arXiv 2609.36826 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning also fits: Diffusion reasoning and test-time scaling

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Video generation models have demonstrated emerging zero-shot capabilities for visual reasoning, perception, and other vision tasks. However, diffusion-based video generation is inherently stochastic, while many downstream vision tasks are deterministic. Motivated by the effectiveness of self-consistency in chain-of-thought reasoning for large language models, we investigate whether self-consistency can similarly improve diffusion-based video reasoning. We first introduce a training-free test-time scaling method that samples multiple video generations and aggregates their predictions through self-consistency. Specifically, we aggregate extracted paths, locations, or masks from multiple rollouts into a consensus prediction. To reduce the inference overhead of multi-rollout generation, we read out predictions early in the denoising trajectory, which preserves consensus quality while reducing denoising steps by more than half. We further propose Rejection Fine-Tuning (RFT) to distill consensus predictions into the video generation model. The resulting model internalizes the benefit of multi-sample consensus and requires only a single generation at inference time, while substantially outperforming the original model. Experiments on three tasks, including maze solving, visual search, and referring segmentation, show that both our self-consistency inference and consensus distillation dramatically improve video-based perception and reasoning, without requiring ground-truth videos or task-specific verification. For visual search, self-consistency raises task accuracy from 48.4% for a single generation to 99.0%. The distilled model retains much of the consensus benefit with a single rollout. For 4-by-4 maze solving, consensus-based training improves the single-generation strict success rate from 72.0% to 84.0% with the same inference latency.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 27 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

27 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Video Models Can Reason with Verifiable Rewards14 May
  2. 2026Video Models Reason Early: Exploiting Plan Commitment for Maze Solving31 Mar
  3. 2026Wan-R1: Verifiable-Reinforcement Learning for Video Reasoning29 Mar
  4. 2026Demystifying Video Reasoning17 Mar
  5. 2025Reasoning via Video: The First Evaluation of Video Models' Reasoning Abilities through Maze-Solving Tasks19 Nov
  6. 2025Thinking with Video: Video Generation as a Promising Multimodal Reasoning Paradigm6 Nov
  7. 2025Are Video Models Ready as Zero-Shot Reasoners? An Empirical Study with the MME-CoF Benchmark30 Oct
  8. 2025Video models are zero-shot learners and reasoners24 Sep

Other references · 19

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  3. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  4. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
  5. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
  6. 2023Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 790
  7. 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improvecited by 664
  8. 2025TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learningcited by 275
  9. 2023GRES: Generalized Referring Expression Segmentationcited by 254
  10. 2024Understanding the Limits of Vision Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding Problemcited by 75
  11. 2024Zigzag Diffusion Sampling: Diffusion Models Can Self-Improve via Self-Reflectioncited by 41
  12. 2025Video-T1: Test-Time Scaling for Video Generationcited by 40
7 more
  1. 2025First SFT, Second RL, Third UPT: Continual Improving Multi-Modal LLM Reasoning via Unsupervised Post-Trainingcited by 34
  2. 2026Self-Refining Video Samplingcited by 15
  3. 2026Video Generation Models are General-Purpose Vision Learnerscited by 14
  4. 2026What If Consensus Lies? Selective-Complementary Reinforcement Learning at Test Timecited by 12
  5. 2024Can Generative Video Models Help Pose Estimation?cited by 7
  6. 2026Proprio: Latent Self-Scoring and Inference-Time Refinement for Physically Plausible Video Generationcited by 6
  7. 2026Toward Early Quality Assessment of Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Hierarchical Denoising For Multi-Step Visual Reasoning
  2. 2026Temporal Backtracking Search for Test-time Generative Video Reasoning
  3. 2025TiViBench: Benchmarking Think-in-Video Reasoning for Video Generative Models
  4. 2026VideoLatent: Video-Language Learning via Latent Self-Forcing
  5. 2026SYNCR: Diagnosing and Learning Cross-Video Reasoning from Simulation
  6. 2025MMGR: Multi-Modal Generative Reasoning Benchmark and Evaluation
  7. 2025Beyond the Last Frame: Process-aware Evaluation for Generative Video Reasoning
  8. 2025VChain: Chain-of-Visual-Thought for Reasoning in Video Generation