mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

UpliftMem: Learning Set-Level Uplift for Agent Memory Retrieval

arXiv 2609.36805 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM) agents reuse external memory to guide new tasks, but effective retrieval requires learning which memory sets improve execution. Such learning relies on costly outcome feedback: ordinary retrieval observes only executed sets, while evaluating alternatives requires additional rollouts. We introduce textscUpliftMem, which learns memory retrieval from set-level execution uplift relative to the same executor without memory. A theoretical analysis of how retrieval preferences restrict feedback coverage motivates targeted probing of alternative memory sets. Probe selection follows an expected value of sample information (EVSI) criterion, derived in closed form under a correlated Gaussian model, to allocate limited training rollouts according to their expected improvement in local retrieval decisions. The shared scorer is trained with a frozen executor and selects memory sets without test-time probes. Across ALFWorld, WebShop, and BigCodeBench, textscUpliftMem achieves the best success rates among evaluated baselines on the main evaluation sets. Controlled fixed-store and matched probe budget evaluations further demonstrate improved memory-use decisions and more effective use of execution feedback.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

14 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026MemSyco-Bench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Agent Memory1 Jul
  2. 2026MemReranker: Reasoning-Aware Reranking for Agent Memory Retrieval7 May
  3. 2025Memento: Fine-tuning LLM Agents without Fine-tuning LLMs22 Aug
  4. 2025Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory28 Apr

Other references · 10

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
  3. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
  4. 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,251
  5. 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,205
  6. 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 432
  7. 2024AI Agents That Mattercited by 219
  8. 2026MemRL: Self-Evolving Agents via Runtime Reinforcement Learning on Episodic Memorycited by 129
  9. 2026Dynamic Dual-Granularity Skill Bank for Agentic RLcited by 34
  10. 2026SkillAligner: Treating Retrieved Skills as Adaptable Drafts at Execution Timecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Retrieval-Augmented LLM Agents: Learning to Learn from Experience
  2. 2025MemR3: Memory Retrieval via Reflective Reasoning for LLM Agents
  3. 2026ERSkill: Evolving for Skill-Guided Adaptive Memory Retrieval
  4. 2026Memory as a Controlled Process: Learned Adaptive Memory Management for LLM Agents
  5. 2026AdaMEM: Test-Time Adaptive Memory for Language Agents
  6. 2026AttriMem: Attribution-Guided Process Feedback for Agent Memory Construction
  7. 2026MemoryCPT: An End-to-End Agent Memory Framework for Cost-Performance Trade-off
  8. 2026MemRetriever: Learning to Search, Reflect, and Retrieve from Long-Term Memory ↗