mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cheap and Powerful Tests for Supervised Subspaces: Per-Component Inference for PLS

arXiv 2609.36307 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression extracts a few outcome-aligned directions in a high-dimensional X and is widely used across applied science, but inference on the resulting fit is either expensive, biased and discouraged, or absent. We reduce inference to held-out OLS refits of the supervised subspace, a primitive shared by PLS, supervised PCA, and linear probes, and supply two tests using held-out correlations: a Nadeau-Bengio corrected asymptotic t-test as a fast approximation, and a permutation test with comparable power, finite-sample valid under outcome-predictor independence and iid rows. Held-out predictions are unchanged under any orthogonal rebasing of the supervised span, so an interpretable basis such as varimax inherits the joint claim but not a per-axis p-value; per-component claims come from a fixed-sequence test on the PLS extraction order. We validate on synthetic geometries, two NIR chemometric datasets, and cross-lingual word-embedding regressions; the exact test also transfers to supervised PCA and a ridge probe. The proposed tests have more power than CV-permutation-Q^2, at a fraction of its cost. A pre-run check on n and the spectrum of X says when the approximation is safe. We release a Rust library with Python, R, and Julia bindings, plus a Python text pipeline.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

12 of 58 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  3. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  4. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  5. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  6. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  7. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
  8. 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 205
  9. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 175
  10. 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometrycited by 58
  11. 2022Probing Classifiers are Unreliable for Concept Removal and Detectioncited by 40
  12. 2015Can parametric statistical methods be trusted for fMRI based group studies?cited by 22

Built on by

Not cited yet.