Cheap and Powerful Tests for Supervised Subspaces: Per-Component Inference for PLS
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression extracts a few outcome-aligned directions in a high-dimensional X and is widely used across applied science, but inference on the resulting fit is either expensive, biased and discouraged, or absent. We reduce inference to held-out OLS refits of the supervised subspace, a primitive shared by PLS, supervised PCA, and linear probes, and supply two tests using held-out correlations: a Nadeau-Bengio corrected asymptotic t-test as a fast approximation, and a permutation test with comparable power, finite-sample valid under outcome-predictor independence and iid rows. Held-out predictions are unchanged under any orthogonal rebasing of the supervised span, so an interpretable basis such as varimax inherits the joint claim but not a per-axis p-value; per-component claims come from a fixed-sequence test on the PLS extraction order. We validate on synthetic geometries, two NIR chemometric datasets, and cross-lingual word-embedding regressions; the exact test also transfers to supervised PCA and a ridge probe. The proposed tests have more power than CV-permutation-Q^2, at a fraction of its cost. A pre-run check on n and the spectrum of X says when the approximation is safe. We release a Rust library with Python, R, and Julia bindings, plus a Python text pipeline.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
12 of 58 references.
References · 12
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
- 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 205
- 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 175
- 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometrycited by 58
- 2022Probing Classifiers are Unreliable for Concept Removal and Detectioncited by 40
- 2015Can parametric statistical methods be trusted for fMRI based group studies?cited by 22
Built on by
Not cited yet.