mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-Class, Multi-Tier Network Intrusion Detection: A Comprehensive and Reproducible Benchmark

arXiv 2609.36039 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have dominated Intrusion Detection System (IDS) research in recent years. Unfortunately, many existing studies have produced inflated results and unreliable benchmarks due to critical oversights and mistakes in the ML and DL pipeline, from data collection and labeling to feature engineering and model training and evaluation. CIC-IDS2017 is a standard benchmark for network intrusion detection. Still, many published results on this dataset are difficult to compare due to labeling errors, inconsistent flow extraction, potential leakage, and performance evaluation metrics dominated by benign traffic. In this paper, we present a comprehensive benchmark with corrected PCAP-level labeling and a complete evaluation pipeline with diverse ML models. We evaluate eleven tabular classifiers at three nested levels: binary attack detection, nine-class attack-family attribution, and fifteen-class fine-grained classification. A soft-voting ensemble of Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM obtains the best fine-tier macro-F1 of 0.955, with coarse and binary macro-F1 scores of 0.980 and 0.999, respectively. We further conducted a feature selection study based on an analysis of feature importance. This comprehensive benchmark pipeline is configurable and open-source, enabling new feature extraction and model plugins for new datasets. Future work should use this pipeline as a reference point for richer features, rare-class analysis, and model generalization towards new datasets and attack classes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

8 of 25 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
  4. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
  5. 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 198
  6. 2021How to avoid machine learning pitfalls: a guide for academic researcherscited by 34
  7. 2024Variability-Aware Machine Learning Model Selection: Feature Modeling, Instantiation, and Experimental Case Studycited by 1
  8. 2025Automated and Explainable Denial of Service Analysis for AI-Driven Intrusion Detection Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.