Agentic Federated Learning: Rule-Based Client and Server Agents for Adaptive Training
New in LLM agents and tool use; no direction yet. LLM agents and tool use
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients without sharing raw data, making it suitable for privacy-sensitive applications such as healthcare, finance, and edge intelligence. However, conventional FL approaches rely on static client participation and fixed aggregation strategies, which limits their effectiveness under non-IID data distributions, heterogeneous client behavior, and noisy or unreliable updates. To overcome these issuess, this paper proposes an Agentic Federated Learning (AFL) framework that integrates lightweight rule-based autonomous agents at both client and server levels. The proposed framework introduces a Client-Side Agent (CSA) that dynamically adapts local training parameters, controls participa- tion, and evaluates update reliability, while a Server-Side Orchestrator Agent (SSOA) performs quality-aware client selection and adaptive aggregation. Unlike traditional FL methods, AFL enables context-aware decision-making during the training process, improving adaptability and robustness in dynamic distributed environments. Extensive experiments conducted on the CIFAR-10 dataset under IID, non-IID, and noisy-client settings demonstrate that AFL consistently outperforms standard base- lines including FedAvg and FedProx. Experimental results show improvements in classification accuracy, convergence speed, robustness against corrupted updates, and communication efficiency. Ablation studies further confirm the complementary contributions of CSA and SSOA, while statistical analysis validates the significance of the observed gains. The proposed AFL framework demonstrates that incorporating autonomous agentic reasoning into federated learning provides an effective and practical solution for intelligent, adaptive, and robust distributed learning systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
5 of 17 references.
References · 5
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
- 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 633
- 2026Robust Federated Learning for Malicious Clients using Loss Trend Deviation Detectioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Agentic Federated Learning: The Future of Distributed Training Orchestration
- 2026Auto-FL-Research: Agentic Search for Federated Learning Algorithms
- 2025FedAgentBench: Towards Automating Real-world Federated Medical Image Analysis with Server-Client LLM Agents
- 2025Optimized Local Updates in Federated Learning via Reinforcement Learning
- 2026FL-MAESTRO: Multi-Agent LLM Orchestration for Resource-Constrained Federated Learning
- 2026FedEHR-Agents: Federated Agentic Optimization for Automated EHR Modeling
- 2025Helmsman: Autonomous Synthesis of Federated Learning Systems via Collaborative LLM Agents
- 2026Agentic Trust Coordination for Federated Learning through Adaptive Thresholding and Autonomous Decision Making in Sustainable and Resilient Industrial Networks