Telescopic Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One deployed language model must often serve many compute budgets, yet serving each budget still means a separate training or compression run per point. We train a Telescopic Language Model (TLM) to be that continuum: a nested-capacity Transformer supervised by stochastic prefix supervision with a full anchor. At every step, one randomly truncated prefix of the capacity axis is trained against the full next-token target, alongside one full-capacity pass, so the trained artifact is a valid language model at every depth. Two forward-backward passes per step, no architectural change, nothing extra at inference. Fixed-exit suites such as Matryoshka Language Model Suites (MLMS) occupy one point in this design space, and the point has a cost: supervising only a few fixed exits leaves the nested model at chance level everywhere else (perplexity 10^2-10^5 in our baselines). On a 200M proxy suite (20B FineWeb-Edu tokens, identical data stream for all methods), a single TLM run is a valid language model at every one of its twenty layer prefixes, in perplexity and on perplexity-sensitive downstream tasks, reducing the area under the quality-budget curve by 43-44% relative to the fixed-exit suites while matching them at full capacity, at ~12% lower GPU cost per run. The prefix sampling density is a dial: concentrating it on a few depths recovers fixed-exit quality there at the price of the continuum, so the operating points become a training-time choice rather than an architectural one. These results indicate that the training objective, not the nesting itself, is what makes a model elastic.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
28 of 33 references.
References · 28
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,653
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 979
- 2019Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient Deploymentcited by 787
- 2019Compressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence Modellingcited by 726
- 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 723
- 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 650
- 2017BranchyNet: Fast Inference via Early Exiting from Deep Neural Networkscited by 596
16 more
- 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 492
- 2018A Discourse-Aware Attention Model for Abstractive Summarization of Long Documentscited by 478
- 2019Reducing Transformer Depth on Demand with Structured Dropoutcited by 439
- 2024SliceGPT: Compress Large Language Models by Deleting Rows and Columnscited by 385
- 2020DeeBERT: Dynamic Early Exiting for Accelerating BERT Inferencecited by 332
- 2022Confident Adaptive Language Modelingcited by 310
- 2024LayerSkip: Enabling Early Exit Inference and Self-Speculative Decodingcited by 307
- 2018Slimmable Neural Networkscited by 305
- 2022Matryoshka Representation Learningcited by 282
- 2024Mixture-of-Depths: Dynamically allocating compute in transformer-based language modelscited by 258
- 2020DynaBERT: Dynamic BERT with Adaptive Width and Depthcited by 251
- 2019Depth-Adaptive Transformercited by 236
- 2019Universally Slimmable Networks and Improved Training Techniquescited by 221
- 2014Learning Ordered Representations with Nested Dropoutcited by 84
- 2024Flextron: Many-in-One Flexible Large Language Modelcited by 45
- 2024MatryoshkaKV: Adaptive KV Compression via Trainable Orthogonal Projectioncited by 29
Built on by
Not cited yet.