mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Manifold-Stable Flow Matching

arXiv 2609.35454 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.RO cs.SYcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science also fits: Diffusion and flow policies for robotics

Abstract (arXiv)

Flow matching (FM) learns generative dynamics through velocity regression. Geometric FM variants commonly assume a prior supported on the data manifold, requiring geometric knowledge that is often unavailable. Without such knowledge, low regression error alone does not guarantee manifold adherence. Adherence keeps generated samples within valid configurations and is empirically associated with better task performance. We introduce manifold-stable flow matching (MSFM), which can start from an arbitrary ambient prior, not necessarily supported on the manifold. Using tools from nonlinear dynamics, namely contraction theory, MSFM combines learned tangential transport with prescribed normal contraction. The construction uses analytical projectors for known manifolds and local affine proxies estimated by principal component analysis for unknown data geometry. By implementing contraction theory in both cases of known and unknown manifolds, we guarantee manifold invariance and transverse convergence to the manifold within a desired time window (e.g., one second). We derive a family of compatible probability paths and decompose the training loss into a learnable tangential term and a normal residual. An ellipse experiment attains a mean terminal off-manifold error of order 10-6. In Push-T robotic experiments, MSFM raises success from 74% to 82%. In the Robomimic Square task, success increases from 60% to 72%, while rotation-manifold deviation decreases from order 10-2 to 10-7. The MSFM terminal geometric errors are controlled by the chosen numerical tolerance. These results demonstrate stronger geometric adherence and higher observed task performance, supporting prescribed normal contraction as a complement to learned generative transport.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 38 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

38 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 16

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Topological Flow Matching14 Jun
  2. 2026Geodesic Flow Matching for Denoising High-Dimensional Structured Representations29 May
  3. 2026Riemannian MeanFlow for One-Step Generation on Manifolds11 Mar
  4. 2026Flow Matching is Adaptive to Manifold Structures25 Feb
  5. 2025Mirror Flow Matching with Heavy-Tailed Priors for Generative Modeling on Convex Domains10 Oct
  6. 2025Carr'e du champ flow matching: better quality-generalisation tradeoff in generative models7 Oct
  7. 2025Physics-Constrained Fine-Tuning of Flow-Matching Models for Generation and Inverse Problems5 Aug
  8. 2025Bures-Wasserstein Flow Matching for Graph Generation16 Jun
  9. 2025Physics vs Distributions: Pareto Optimal Flow Matching with Physics Constraints10 Jun
  10. 2025Energy Matching: Unifying Flow Matching and Energy-Based Models for Generative Modeling14 Apr
  11. 2025Riemannian Variational Flow Matching for Material and Protein Design18 Feb
  12. 2024Pullback Flow Matching on Data Manifolds6 Oct
4 more
  1. 2024Meta Flow Matching: Integrating Vector Fields on the Wasserstein Manifold26 Aug
  2. 2024Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold23 May
  3. 2023Flow Matching on General Geometries7 Feb
  4. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct

Other references · 22

  1. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,838
  2. 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 939
  3. 2021What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulationcited by 725
  4. 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 511
  5. 2024EquiBot: SIM(3)-Equivariant Diffusion Policy for Generalizable and Data Efficient Learningcited by 75
  6. 2024Equivariant Diffusion Policycited by 66
  7. 2024Learning Robotic Manipulation Policies from Point Clouds with Conditional Flow Matchingcited by 65
  8. 2024Riemannian Flow Matching Policy for Robot Motion Learningcited by 63
  9. 2023Diffusion-EDFs: Bi-equivariant Denoising Generative Modeling on SE(3) for Visual Robotic Manipulationcited by 52
  10. 2025ManiFlow: A General Robot Manipulation Policy via Consistency Flow Trainingcited by 49
  11. 2021Contraction Theory for Nonlinear Stability Analysis and Learning-based Control: A Tutorial Overviewcited by 45
  12. 2025Much Ado About Noising: Dispelling the Myths of Generative Robotic Controlcited by 36
10 more
  1. 2024ET-SEED: Efficient Trajectory-Level SE(3) Equivariant Diffusion Policycited by 26
  2. 2024Fast and Robust Visuomotor Riemannian Flow Matching Policycited by 18
  3. 2024Neural Contractive Dynamical Systemscited by 14
  4. 2025DDAT: Diffusion Policies Enforcing Dynamically Admissible Robot Trajectoriescited by 14
  5. 2025SafeFlowMatcher: Safe and Fast Planning using Flow Matching with Control Barrier Functionscited by 12
  6. 2024Learning Neural Contracting Dynamics: Extended Linearization and Global Guaranteescited by 11
  7. 2025SE(3)-Equivariant Diffusion Policy in Spherical Fourier Spacecited by 8
  8. 2025How Well do Diffusion Policies Learn Kinematic Constraint Manifolds?cited by 3
  9. 2026Improving Classifier-Free Guidance of Flow Matching via Manifold Projectioncited by 3
  10. 2026Efficient Hybrid SE(3)-Equivariant Visuomotor Flow Policy via Spherical Harmonics for Robot Manipulationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Total Variation Rates for Riemannian Flow Matching
  2. 2024Categorical Flow Matching on Statistical Manifolds
  3. 2025On the continuity of flows
  4. 2026RiT: Vanilla Diffusion Transformers Suffice in Representation Space
  5. 2026Let the Dynamics Flow: Stable Flow Matching Dynamical Systems
  6. 2026Particle Dynamics of Flow Matching and Classifier-Free Guidance from a Stagewise Geometry Perspective
  7. 2026VTV-FM: Flow Matching through Variational Terminal-Velocity Closure
  8. 2025Energy Guided Geometric Flow Matching