GAC-PINN: Geometry-Adaptive and Constraint-Enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For systems with steep gradients, sharp interfaces, or severe spatio-temporal coupling, Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) suffer from spectral bias, geometric inflexibility, and boundary constraint conflicts, which undermine accuracy and convergence. To overcome these issues, we propose a geometry-adaptive and constraint-enhanced PINN (GAC-PINN). The framework comprises four components: a gradient-driven adaptive grid mapping (AGM) for diffeomorphic point concentration with Jacobian regularization, an adaptive bandwidth hard-constraint ansatz with spatially-varying boundary transition widths, a Gaussian Fourier feature mapping as a spectral preconditioner to further enhance high-wavenumber representation, and an operator-aware router that automatically selects the appropriate hard-constraint construction based on whether the governing PDE contains temporal derivatives. An AGM callback mechanism and a three-stage training strategy ensure stable coordination. Benchmarks including the viscous Burgers equation, a sharp-peaked 2D Poisson problem, and the Allen-Cahn phase-transition equation show that GAC-PINN attains relative (L2) errors of ((1.747± 0.450)× 10-4), ((2.868± 0.947)× 10-5), and ((1.756 ± 0.712)× 10-3), respectively, consistently outperforming the baselines. Ablation studies further reveal that AGM alone yields a substantially lower error than residual-based adaptive refinement (RAR), while RAR becomes beneficial only when combined with FFM, demonstrating a context-dependent module interaction. Convergence analysis verifies rapid error reduction and saturation with increasing resolution, establishing a practical adaptive framework for high-fidelity simulation of problems with localized sharp features in applied mechanics and computational physics.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
11 of 29 references.
References · 11
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,610
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 633
- 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 618
- 2021Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse designcited by 278
- 2022A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networkscited by 234
- 2021Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problemscited by 220
- 2022Respecting causality is all you need for training physics-informed neural networkscited by 155
- 2023PINNacle: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving PDEscited by 85
- 2023PINNsFormer: A Transformer-Based Framework For Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 62
- 2025RAMS: Residual-based adversarial-gradient moving sample method for scientific machine learning in solving partial differential equationscited by 4
- 2025Spectral Analysis of Hard-Constraint PINNs: The Spatial Modulation Mechanism of Boundary Functionscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.